University of Houston - Campus Recreation and Wellness Center - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% | |
| 2 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 40% |
| 3 | FRAY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
| 3 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 40% | |
| 5 | TIEMANN Landen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 49% | 7% | |
| 6 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 7 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 8 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 9 | LESCURE Dimitri | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 10 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 13% |
| 11 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 12 | TAMEZ TRUJILLO jose antonio | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 13 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 14 | GONZALEZ Kian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
| 15 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 16 | LI Tristan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% | |
| 18 | LEE Stewart S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 19 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | |
| 20 | LU Ryan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | MULDOON Thomas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 22 | SOOS Whitman | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 23 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | DECKER Hunter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% | 2% | |
| 25 | VINOTH Aaron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
| 26 | PEREZ Daniel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | JOHNSON Ryder | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 6% |
| 28 | RAO Neil | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | DADE MAXIMUS | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | SCEROLER Anslee | 100% | 96% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | MUGA Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 1% |
| 32 | QIAN Irvine | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 33 | CARDENAS Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 50% | 7% | |
| 34 | COHEN Nathan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 17% | |
| 36 | TRACY James | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 37 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | 100% | 92% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% | |
| 40 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 62% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | RASMUSSEN Jacob | 100% | 81% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
| 42 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | IBANEZ Benjamin | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | DADE Augustus | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | TUMULA Arihaan | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | RODRIGUEZ Alejandro | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | JERKINS Gianni | 100% | 69% | 20% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | SIDDIQUI Raakin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LEBRIJA Francisco | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 51 | POHL Philip | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | HUANG Ethan | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | LE Nathan | 100% | 95% | 64% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | NGUYEN Bao | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 55 | FALKIEWICZ Alec R. | 100% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | FOX Joshua | 100% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | TREVINO Lucas | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | GONIMA Francisco | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.