Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | RIGGINS Joshua | V V V V D | V V V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
2 | SAUNIER Cameron | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
3 | PARK Ian C. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
3 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
5 | CLICK Tristan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
6 | LAM Alan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
7 | LEE JoonWon | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
8 | SINGH Ravin | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
9 | HEADRICK Lance | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
10 | WANG Clayton | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
11 | PETROW Zoryan | V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
12 | YI Nathan | V V D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
13 | JORDAN Anton | V D V V V D | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
14 | TIKHONOV Daniel | V V D D D V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
15 | RUSSELL James | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
16 | LEE Aiden | D D D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
17 | DESTEFANO Julius | V V V V V V | V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
18 | HAN Sam | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
19 | HULL Liam | V V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
20 | CHENH Justin | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
21 | MODANLOU Navid | D V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | BERNARD Jack B. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
23 | FISHMAN Rahm | D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
24 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
25 | ALI Farhan | D V D V D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
26 | DUAN eric | V D V D D V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
27 | LEE Benjamin | D V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
28 | MEGGERS Davin | D V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
29 | BUI Henry | D D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
30 | ZHANG Lucas | D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
31 | LEECH Braedan | D V D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
32 | CHEN Brian | D D V V D D | V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
33 | LEE Aiden | V V D D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
34 | HEADRICK Jack | V V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
35 | DONNELLY Enzo | V D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
36 | WATERS Nathaniel | V V D V D V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
37 | MAROCHNIK Daniel | V V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
38 | CHEMEZOV Trent | V V V D D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
39 | PAL Ian K. | V D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
39 | YAP Nathan | V D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
41 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | V D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
42 | FONG Henry | V D D D V V | D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
43 | KE Sebastian | V D D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
44 | YANG Gary | V D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
45 | SHILOV Maxim | V V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
46 | KONG Brandon | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
47 | CHAWLA Aarav | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
48 | MARKOWITZ Sam | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
49 | REKHI Krish | D D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
50 | CHO Alex | D D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
51 | DINKINS Adam | D V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
52 | EVANS George | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
53 | KIM Joshua | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
54 | SZIEDE Kieran | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
54 | DAVIS Andrew | V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
56 | DAVIS Jonah | D V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
57 | LEE Anton | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
58 | NOLAN Tyler | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
59 | WANG Aiden | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
60 | MAXWELL Sheito | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
61 | BROSNAN Solomon | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
62 | RAPALSKI Thomas | D D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
63 | LIN Haley | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
64 | ADDYSON Aidan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
65 | BANG Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
66 | GATEWOOD Michael | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
67 | ODEA Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.