Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XIAO julie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
2 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
3 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
3 | LIU Sophie | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
5 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
6 | FESTA Carina | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
7 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
8 | SHI Julia | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 29% | |
9 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
10 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
10 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% |
12 | LEE Hannah | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
13 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% | |
14 | CHEN Ashley | - | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
15 | SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
16 | LAURI Keira | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
17 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
18 | JOHNSON Lydia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 13% |
19 | LIN Nicole | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
20 | NATH Trisha | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
21 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
22 | DAVIS Jayna M. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
23 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 45% | 32% |
24 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 1% |
25 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 53% | 8% |
26 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
27 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
28 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
29 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 1% |
30 | JEON Yuju | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 14% |
31 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
32 | WANG Callie | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
33 | JUNG Irene | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
34 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
35 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
36 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
37 | WU Helen | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
38 | XIONG Haojiao | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
39 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
40 | LEOU Korina | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
41 | KER Grace | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
42 | FAVO Isabella | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
43 | HU Anna | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
44 | GUVEN Coco | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
45 | BOYNTON Ainsley | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
46 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | 11% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
47 | LIN Audrey J. | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% | |
48 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
49 | DAI Olivia | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
50 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
51 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
51 | HUCHWAJDA Pola | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
53 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
54 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
55 | DIECK Miranda P. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
56 | LI Jiaying | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
57 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
58 | YANG Lea | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
59 | GRULICH Rayaana | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
60 | JEONG Katie | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
61 | WEI JoyAnn | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
62 | MUND Ruth | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
63 | AWAD Royce | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
64 | KIM Marley I. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 47% | 19% |
65 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
66 | FEIG Sela | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
67 | GOLDIN Nina | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
68 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 21% |
69 | WU Yuwei | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
70 | MARYASH Samantha | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 9% |
71 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 12% |
71 | DANG Kelia | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
73 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
74 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
75 | LIU Sydney | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
76 | HSU Leah | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
77 | HENRY Soraya S. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
78 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
79 | KNOBEL Sophia | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
80 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
81 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
82 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 16% |
83 | SCOTT Eve | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
84 | ZOLLER Noelle | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
85 | LIU Yifei | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
86 | KANG Ellie | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
87 | LU Elaine | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
87 | KINKADE Ellie | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
89 | LITTLE Avery | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% |
90 | ZENG Sarah | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - |
91 | CARTER Keely | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
92 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
93 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
94 | LU Amy | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
94 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
96 | SHI Cathleen | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 34% |
97 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
98 | PAPAPETROPOULOU ALEXANDRA | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
99 | WANG Jiayi | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
100 | MACKAY Katherine | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
101 | TSE Angelina | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 49% | 10% | |
102 | CAO Sophie | 2% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
103 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
104 | GAY Sasha | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
105 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% |
106 | LUKER Sophia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 41% | 7% |
107 | FERNANDEZ Martina | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
108 | LIU Hannah | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
109 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
110 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
111 | KONDEV Elizabeth | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
111 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
113 | LIU kai yin aria | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
114 | DONG Angel | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% | - |
115 | YUAN Greta | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
116 | TENG EMMA | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
117 | BUSH Bethany | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
117 | MUNGUIA Mila | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
119 | MCAFEE Jada | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
119 | OCA Merci | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
121 | KHAN Alissa | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | |
122 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
123 | DHAR Layla | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
124 | STONE Coral | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
125 | BARBOSA Katia | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
126 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
127 | TA-ZHOU Emma | - | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
128 | HANLON Lucy | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
129 | HUANG MADELINE | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
130 | PADANILAM Lily | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
131 | CHUNG Hailey | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 2% |
132 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
133 | DANTULURI Shivani | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
134 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 49% | 10% | |
135 | BERMAN greta | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
136 | BERNARD Kathryn | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
137 | MALEK Zolie | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
138 | GOLOVITSER Maya | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
139 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
140 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
141 | LIM Jaslene | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 6% |
142 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
142 | LIU Kelly | - | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
144 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
145 | LO Chloe | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
146 | FLATT Sophia | 6% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
147 | YUEN Nicole | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
148 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
149 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
150 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
150 | MAO anna | 8% | 42% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
152 | WANG yining | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
153 | SPEARS Mya B | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
154 | SAYSON Andrea | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
155 | DANTULURI Shalini | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 9% | - |
156 | CHI Claire | 2% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
156 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
158 | DAVIDOVA Kira | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
158 | WILSON Eva | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
160 | LEE Sophia | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
160 | HAN Emma | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
162 | LIU Zhi Jun | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
163 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
164 | ZHENG Valentina | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
165 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
166 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
167 | CHEN Elaine | - | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
167 | NAMBIAR GEETA MAHESH | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% |
169 | BARROSO Isabela | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
170 | DUDNICK Morgan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
171 | CHANG Norah | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
171 | REAVIS Isabel | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
173 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
174 | LUKER Hannah | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
175 | MYAT Chloe | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
176 | SHEARER Alena | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
177 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
178 | TONG Jessie | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
179 | MEYERSON Michelle | 6% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
180 | WALLER London | 17% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
181 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
182 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
183 | TURIANO Nadelle | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
184 | CROOKS Riley | - | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
185 | SHMULER Fiona | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
186 | ZHANG Sophie | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
187 | NADKARNI Marisa | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
187 | YU Holly | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
189 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
190 | XU Emily T. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
191 | XIE Nora | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
192 | GOEL Lineysha | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
193 | STADNIK Emilia | 1% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
194 | HUANG Rachael | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
195 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
195 | LEE Alyson | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
197 | HUANG Doris | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
198 | BROWN Aria | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
199 | CHOI Charlotte | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
200 | BROWNER June | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
201 | GONZALEZ Veronika | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
202 | COOVADIA Malina | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
203 | KHOST Maeve | 1% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
204 | AKULA Roszlynn | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
205 | BARNES Sarah | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
206 | BROCK Sydney | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
207 | REN Katherine | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
208 | KIM isabel | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
208 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 19% | 45% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
208 | LI Yitong | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
211 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
212 | MCGRAW Sadie | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
213 | YAM Danika | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | - |
214 | HUANG Neila | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
215 | KWON Ava | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | |
216 | HARRISON Allie | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
217 | OU Yixuan | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
218 | COLBY Mercer | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - | |
219 | MAK Kaitlin | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
220 | PABIAN Emilia | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
221 | WONG Charlene | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
222 | QIU Katherine | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
223 | CASTELO Soleil | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
224 | KIRBY Skye | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
224 | KIM Grace | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
226 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
227 | CRAINE Alexandra E. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
228 | PRESANTH Nandana | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
229 | UEMOTO Lynn | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
230 | QUINN Anna | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
231 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 2% | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
232 | WOO Catherine | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
233 | PARK Haylie | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
234 | BAIK Sarah | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
235 | ALAMI Amira | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
235 | LEE Kaitlin | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
235 | ZHAN Sophie | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
235 | KANG Soeun | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
239 | BAINS Nandini | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
240 | VATS Ishita | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
241 | PROBASCO Leila | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
242 | BARBORIAK Emily | 39% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
243 | VINOKUR Anita | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
244 | ILAGAN Ava | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
244 | ALFONSO-VALLEJO Cecilia | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
246 | HOLMES Sabrina | - | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
247 | ALDORT Amanda | 2% | 42% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
248 | LI Sonia | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
248 | MAO Elsa | 10% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
250 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
251 | NAIR Supriya | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
252 | NEUMAN Ella | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
253 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
254 | NGUYEN Madeleine | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
255 | BERRIOS Catalina | 16% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
256 | NAYAK Antara | 5% | 36% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
257 | SAINT-PIERRE-MENARD Elora | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
258 | REDA Sophie | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
258 | LAGOON Miriam | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
258 | NASER Sarah | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
261 | KALISHMAN Anna | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
261 | NEWMARK Ellie | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
261 | KIM Audrey | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
261 | LAI Evelyn | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
265 | NAYAK Anika | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
265 | RIFKIN Lielle | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
265 | LAI Kaitlyn | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
268 | PATEL Sia Patel | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
268 | LECHALLIER Naya | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
268 | THOMAS Grace | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
271 | MCCAWLEY Madeleine | 99% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
271 | LEUNG Ella | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
273 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
273 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
275 | MANGAT Alexis | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.