Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | V V V V D | V V V V V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
2 | SHENG Dalton | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | HOU Gaven | D V D D V | V V V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
3 | KO Caleb | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
5 | HOLLIS Sean | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
6 | OROPEZA David | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
7 | SALEH Omar | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
8 | DOELL Ethan | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
9 | XIE Jicheng | V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
10 | ABRAMKIN Tim | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
11 | BELCHAMBER Mason | V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
12 | CHENG Logan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | WONG Jacob W. | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
14 | ZHANG Hanru | V D V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
15 | TOOMRE Kai | D D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
16 | LU Jingyi | V D D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
17 | BERNARD Cohen | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
18 | ZENG Rick | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | XU Nathan | V V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
20 | GE Felix Fei | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
21 | BOURGUIGNAT James | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
22 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | V D V V D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
23 | GRUNENWALD Henri | D D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
24 | NEWMAN Noah | V V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
25 | JIN Andy | V D D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
26 | KIM Aiden | D D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
27 | PLUMMER Waylon | D V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
28 | POWELL Sean | D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
29 | LI Evan | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
30 | LATORRE Leonardo | D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
31 | HUANG Chenghan | D D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
32 | KUO Phineas | D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
33 | HAN Alexander | D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
34 | GAO Andrew Gao | V V V D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
35 | FANG Haoyu | V V D V D V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
36 | QU Richard | V D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
37 | FOGELSON Hugh | D D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
38 | VOLLMER Quintin | V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
39 | GRIGORIEV Michael | D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
40 | HUYNH Matthew | D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
41 | KAYE Ben | D V D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
42 | CHUN Zachary | D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
43 | OH Joshua | D V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
44 | ZHENG Austin | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
45 | SALEH Ali | D V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
46 | CHEN kenneth | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
47 | WEI JR Shan | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
48 | WANG Luke | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
49 | HU Daniel | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
50 | HU Ben | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
51 | YOUM Tyson | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
52 | QIAN Zekai | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
53 | SUN Henry | D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
54 | WANG Ancen | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
54 | NG Kai | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
56 | CHUN Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
57 | PERKINS Nathaniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.