Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | |
| 2 | SHENG Dalton | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
| 3 | HOU Gaven | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 3 | KO Caleb | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 5 | HOLLIS Sean | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 6 | OROPEZA David | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% |
| 7 | SALEH Omar | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 8 | DOELL Ethan | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 50% | 28% |
| 9 | XIE Jicheng | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 10 | ABRAMKIN Tim | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 11 | BELCHAMBER Mason | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | |
| 12 | CHENG Logan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 13 | WONG Jacob W. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 24% | 3% |
| 14 | ZHANG Hanru | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
| 15 | TOOMRE Kai | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | LU Jingyi | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
| 17 | BERNARD Cohen | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 18 | ZENG Rick | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 19 | XU Nathan | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 20 | GE Felix Fei | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 21 | BOURGUIGNAT James | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 22 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | NEWMAN Noah | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | JIN Andy | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | KIM Aiden | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | PLUMMER Waylon | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | POWELL Sean | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | LI Evan | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | LATORRE Leonardo | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | HUANG Chenghan | - | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | KUO Phineas | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | HAN Alexander | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 34 | GAO Andrew Gao | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 35 | FANG Haoyu | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 36 | QU Richard | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 37 | FOGELSON Hugh | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 38 | VOLLMER Quintin | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% | |
| 39 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | HUYNH Matthew | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 41 | KAYE Ben | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | CHUN Zachary | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | OH Joshua | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | ZHENG Austin | 2% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | SALEH Ali | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | CHEN kenneth | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 47 | WEI JR Shan | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 48 | WANG Luke | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | HU Daniel | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | HU Ben | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | YOUM Tyson | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | QIAN Zekai | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | SUN Henry | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 54 | WANG Ancen | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 54 | NG Kai | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | CHUN Alexander | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.