Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RODE Damian E. | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 2 | SHENG Patrick Y. | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | HIRSCHMAN Burton E. | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 5 | HEKMAT Sina R. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | SANCHEZ Lorenzo J. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 8 | RHYU Kozmo | D V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | GUMAGAY Paul | V V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 10 | GREENBAUM Isaac | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | SMITH Nicholas S. | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | HERGERT Benito | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | WHITEHURST JJ | V V D V V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 14 | LEVY Jeffrey M. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | LI Jeffrey | D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 16 | SCHICKER Glenn | D D D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 17 | HUANG Forest | V V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 18 | WU Byron | D V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 19 | TRAN Jonathan | D V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | TSIPORUKHA Michael I. | D V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 21 | ALFAIATE Lucas | V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 22 | FENWICK Luke A. | D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | MAAS Sean H. | D V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | D V V D D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 25 | SOOMRO Adam A. | V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 26 | MACKINNON Russell H. | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | WANG Eric S | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | SAMMS-HAY Cameron | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | SRITHARAN SANJAYA A. | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | LEWIS William J. | V D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 31 | GRASSIE James | D V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | BADIOLI Carlo | D D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | KIRSCH Adam J. | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 34 | RITCHIE Mark T. | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 35 | MISHIMA Torata | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 36 | DA GRACA Julio | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | PATEL Dev | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 38 | CHERRY Alfred B. | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.