Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JAIN Samyak | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 34% |
| 2 | LEVENTAL Mark | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 3 | HSU Joshua | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% | |
| 3 | PARK Sangwook | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
| 5 | CHOI Zachary | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 6 | ROBINSON Samuel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% | |
| 7 | LI Ethan R. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
| 8 | GACIOCH Noah | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 9 | SIM Ian | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 47% | 26% |
| 10 | GUO Woody | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 1% |
| 11 | ANDERSON Kai | - | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 12 | RICHARD silas | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% | |
| 13 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | GREENMAN Duke | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | CHEN Ryan | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 16 | SU Samuel | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | KLINKNER Richard | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | LI Yunji (Rain) | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 19 | CHANG Andrew | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 20 | WU Steven | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 21 | CHEW Aedan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 22 | MOLLINIER Angel | 2% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 23 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 39% | 6% |
| 24 | BAKKEN Archer | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | CHU Ted | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | WANG Devin | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | JAO Aaron | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | RAHMAN Yousef | - | 8% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 29 | KIM Remington | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 30 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | QIAO James | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | KOLHE Tanish | 17% | 54% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | LOUIE Joseph | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
| 34 | FU Adrian | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 35 | LIN Andrew | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | LIU Max | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WU Eric | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 38 | MANA Arnav | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 10% | |
| 39 | REID Wesley | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 40 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 41 | LI Grayson | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | GUO Luke | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | HAMILTON Travis | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 46 | TOPPING Axel | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | JOHAR Manvik | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 48 | TAMAYO-SARVER Daniel | 9% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHAO Colin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LEE Damon | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | MA Ryan | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | DEVINENI Avyang | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | MCLAREN Mason | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% | |
| 55 | SONG Jonathan | 65% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | LI Sean | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | FAN Jordan | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | MARTIN zachary | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | DENG Andes | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | HIGGINS Calvin | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 61 | GORDON David | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | WONG Vansen | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | RAHMAN Ali | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | JAMES Kaden | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | WANG Dylan | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.