Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
2 | SHOU Raymond | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
3 | HUYNH Kaleb | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
3 | SONG Enoch | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 51% | 8% |
5 | CAO Aaron | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 27% | 4% | |
6 | XIAN kevin | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
7 | CHONG Cooper | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
8 | LIN Ziyue | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 20% | - | |
9 | HUANG Dalynn | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
10 | CASCONE Raffaele | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
11 | QIAN Will | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
12 | SU Sean | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
13 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
14 | DING Jacob | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
15 | MOON Nolan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
16 | MENZEL Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
17 | MOORE Quinn | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | - |
18 | YANG Crescent | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | YANG Luca | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
20 | CAI Mark | - | - | - | < 1% | 18% | 81% | |
21 | CHIN Gregory | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% | - |
22 | WU Connor | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | LEE Ryan | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
24 | TARDIFF Owen | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
25 | FANG Lionel | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
26 | LEONG Michael | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
27 | XIONG Jeffrey | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
28 | GRIFFIN Andrew | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
29 | GENG Vincent | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
30 | XIA Wenhao | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | STARK Ethan | - | 5% | 30% | 45% | 20% | - | |
32 | CHEN Keegan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
33 | JIANG Ethan | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
34 | RAY William | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
35 | WU Yulen | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | JAZWINSKI Archer | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
37 | LIN Tyler | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
38 | ZHANG Andrew | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
39 | SOBO Samuel | 19% | 56% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | ZHANG Vincent | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
41 | MOORE Cooper | 20% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
42 | HARDING James | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
43 | LEE Joseph | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | DENHAM Declan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
45 | DVORNEK Everett | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
46 | SUN Neil | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
46 | XIONG David | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.