Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
2 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
3 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
3 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
5 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 6% |
6 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
7 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | |
8 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
9 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
10 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
11 | WONG Maximus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 9% |
12 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
13 | DURKIN Brian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 1% | |
14 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
15 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
16 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
17 | SONG Changze | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
18 | SPRINGER Elijah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
19 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
20 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 4% |
21 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
22 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 6% | |
23 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - | |
24 | YU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
25 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
26 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 2% |
26 | LYCHKO Maksym | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
28 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
29 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
30 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
31 | LI Jade | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
32 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
33 | PETERSEN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
34 | SHAPIRO Natan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | PESSIN Nadav | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
36 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
37 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
38 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
39 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
40 | BRASSARD Calvin | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
41 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
42 | STEIN Philip | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
43 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
44 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 32% |
45 | SIALA Omar | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
46 | LEE Henry | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
47 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
48 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
49 | MILLER Quinlan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
50 | MARIN Ayan N. | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
51 | LI Ray | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
52 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
54 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
55 | ACAR Devin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | - |
56 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
57 | WU Chi Kuan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
58 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
59 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
60 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | - |
60 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
62 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
63 | REGINA Julian | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
64 | KLINKENBERG Patrick | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
65 | KIM Samuel | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
66 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
67 | PTASZEK Al | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
68 | HSIEN Hong-yu | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | LAW Oliver | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
69 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
71 | CARMAN Elliot | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
72 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
73 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.