Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 3 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 3 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 5 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 6 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 7 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 8 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 9 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 10 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% |
| 11 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 12 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 5% |
| 13 | NG Nico | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 15 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 16 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 17 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% |
| 18 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 5% |
| 19 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 20 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 21 | HE Bronto | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% |
| 22 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 6% |
| 23 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 2% |
| 24 | GOVOROV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 25 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 2% |
| 26 | WU Matthew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 31 | WELCH Sebastian | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 4% |
| 34 | WEISELBERG Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 35 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 36 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | SHI Evan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | BOBORIS Dimitrios | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
| 42 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 43 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CIANCHETTA David | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | DYCKMAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 46 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 47 | DAI Jason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 48 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | QI Bryan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | SMITH Theo | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | YU David | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 54 | KIM Louie | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 57 | JAISING Aaditya | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MCGANN Grant | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | SHAO Mason | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | ROBINSON Blake | 100% | 83% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHENG Jasper | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 63 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 64 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 88% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 66 | LANE Sawyer | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LAW Oliver | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | WITHERELL Logan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 70 | HOLBROOK Silas | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.