AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC Div1A/Vet

Y-12 Men's Saber

Friday, October 25, 2024 at 12:00 PM

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LUC Cedric - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
2 OU Rigel - 1% 7% 27% 44% 22%
3 GRIGORIEV Roman - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
3 VO Blake - 1% 7% 27% 43% 23%
5 GU Andrew - - - 4% 19% 44% 33%
6 YU BOWEN - - - - 5% 28% 66%
7 GREENSTEIN Viktor - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
8 WONG Hawken - - 1% 12% 44% 42%
9 KANG Jeremy - - - 1% 9% 36% 53%
10 TANG Morgan - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
10 YUEN Caleb - - 1% 9% 34% 47% 9%
12 HRISTOV Nickolas - - 3% 21% 50% 25%
13 LUCAS William - - - 2% 14% 39% 44%
14 KAMURA Kosei - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
15 DUFF Michael - 7% 32% 40% 18% 3% -
16 FISCHER Noel - 1% 7% 23% 39% 26% 4%
17 CHOI LIAM - 1% 9% 27% 39% 21% 3%
18 QI Jeremy - 1% 6% 22% 37% 28% 6%
19 GOTTSCHALK Theodore 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1%
20 FU BRANDEN - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11%
21 LI Ryan - 1% 10% 32% 40% 17%
22 HAO Johnny - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
23 PARK Emerson 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% -
24 HWANG Hagan - - - 1% 8% 36% 56%
25 WANG David - 3% 13% 30% 35% 18% 2%
26 RAMBHIA Smit - 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
27 HO Alden - 1% 5% 20% 39% 30% 6%
28 KIM Junseong - - 3% 14% 35% 37% 11%
29 DENG Richard - 13% 37% 36% 13% 1%
30 CHUNG Evan 1% 7% 29% 39% 21% 4%
31 CHOI Brayden Yui Chit 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
32 HSIEH Maxwell 14% 34% 33% 15% 3% - -
33 LEE Brendan - 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 5%
34 TAN Daniel 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 6% -
35 QI Zach 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
36 EKAMBARAM Rithik 1% 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
36 LIU Paul 4% 18% 34% 29% 13% 2% -
38 WU Lucas 2% 12% 32% 34% 17% 3% -
39 MASAKI Alex - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
40 DING Orlando 5% 30% 42% 20% 3% -
41 GU Dean 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
42 TABANCAY Cole 1% 7% 25% 36% 23% 6% -
43 YUE Ivan 1% 9% 24% 34% 24% 7% -
44 LAI Mars - 5% 18% 34% 30% 12% 1%
45 CHAN Troy 4% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
46 WANG James 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 7% 1%
47 VENKATRAMAN Sushil 1% 6% 20% 34% 28% 10% 1%
48 CAO Chong 3% 18% 35% 31% 11% 2% -
49 LIU Chun Shing 4% 19% 33% 28% 12% 2% -
50 GUO Jonathan 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
51 WU Dawei 1% 8% 29% 39% 20% 4%
52 HOLMES Xavier - 12% 36% 36% 14% 2%
53 WONG Alexander 1% 11% 35% 39% 13% 1%
54 DESAI Arthav 2% 27% 42% 24% 5% -
55 YU Ian - - 5% 24% 44% 26%
56 KIM Eric 1% 6% 23% 36% 26% 7% 1%
57 KIM Suin - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
58 SHANKAR Rahm 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
59 CHEN Aaron - 3% 12% 28% 34% 20% 3%
60 HE zhixuan 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7% 1%
61 LEE Kyle Sung Ju 3% 16% 31% 30% 15% 3% -
62 LEE Jayden - 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
62 YANG Aegon 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
64 FAN Yuen 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
65 HAN Kyle 2% 22% 40% 27% 8% 1% -
66 SHEN Alaric - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11%
67 LU Simon - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
68 WANG Darren 4% 19% 37% 29% 10% 1% -
69 IRVINE Cooper 21% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
70 LIU Nico - 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% 1%
71 LUO Gavin 4% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2% -
72 HUGHES-WILLIAMS Atticus A 23% 40% 27% 9% 1% - -
73 UDAYGIRI Adi 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
74 JI Derek 3% 16% 33% 31% 15% 3% -
75 WU August 8% 26% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
76 FAN Yuchen 14% 37% 34% 13% 2% -
77 LI Sky 49% 40% 10% 1% - -
78 KIM Connor 85% 14% 1% - - -
79 YU Albert 56% 36% 8% 1% - -
80 ZHANG Caleb 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
81 ZHENG Matt - 3% 24% 42% 26% 5%
82 LEI Isaac 18% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
83 LOVELL Jackson 27% 48% 21% 4% - - -
84 SHIVAKUMAR Sahil - 1% 6% 19% 34% 30% 10%
85 BODO John 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
86 DUBIN Jake 37% 45% 15% 2% - - -
87 ZHANG Hanzhi 16% 46% 30% 8% 1% -
88 SLOAN Ethan 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
89 JASPERSON Nolan 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
90 CAO Osmond 6% 32% 42% 18% 2% -
91 WOLLOW Bennett 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
92 CHEN Donovan 24% 43% 25% 7% 1% - -
93 LIN Rongcheng Noah 77% 21% 2% - - - -
93 LI Linus 15% 39% 33% 12% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.