Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
2 | OU Rigel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
3 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
3 | VO Blake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
5 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
6 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% |
7 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
8 | WONG Hawken | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | |
9 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
10 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
10 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 9% |
12 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 25% | |
13 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 44% |
14 | KAMURA Kosei | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
15 | DUFF Michael | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
16 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
17 | CHOI LIAM | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
18 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
19 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
20 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
21 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
22 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
23 | PARK Emerson | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
24 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
25 | WANG David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
26 | RAMBHIA Smit | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
27 | HO Alden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
28 | KIM Junseong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
29 | DENG Richard | 100% | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
30 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | |
31 | CHOI Brayden Yui Chit | 100% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
32 | HSIEH Maxwell | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
33 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
34 | TAN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | - |
35 | QI Zach | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
36 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
36 | LIU Paul | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
38 | WU Lucas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
39 | MASAKI Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
40 | DING Orlando | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | |
41 | GU Dean | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
42 | TABANCAY Cole | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 7% | - |
43 | YUE Ivan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 8% | - |
44 | LAI Mars | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
45 | CHAN Troy | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
46 | WANG James | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
47 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
48 | CAO Chong | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
49 | LIU Chun Shing | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
50 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
51 | WU Dawei | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | |
52 | HOLMES Xavier | 100% | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
53 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
54 | DESAI Arthav | 100% | 98% | 71% | 29% | 6% | - | |
55 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
56 | KIM Eric | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
57 | KIM Suin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
58 | SHANKAR Rahm | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
59 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 3% |
60 | HE zhixuan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
61 | LEE Kyle Sung Ju | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
62 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
62 | YANG Aegon | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
64 | FAN Yuen | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
65 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
66 | SHEN Alaric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
67 | LU Simon | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
68 | WANG Darren | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
69 | IRVINE Cooper | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
70 | LIU Nico | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
71 | LUO Gavin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
72 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Atticus A | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
73 | UDAYGIRI Adi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
74 | JI Derek | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
75 | WU August | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
76 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
77 | LI Sky | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
78 | KIM Connor | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
79 | YU Albert | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
80 | ZHANG Caleb | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
81 | ZHENG Matt | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 5% | |
82 | LEI Isaac | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
83 | LOVELL Jackson | 100% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
84 | SHIVAKUMAR Sahil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
85 | BODO John | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
86 | DUBIN Jake | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
87 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 100% | 84% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
88 | SLOAN Ethan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
89 | JASPERSON Nolan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
90 | CAO Osmond | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 2% | - | |
91 | WOLLOW Bennett | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
92 | CHEN Donovan | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
93 | LIN Rongcheng Noah | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
93 | LI Linus | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.