Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KUMBLA Samarth | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | LIN Dashiell | V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | NGUYEN Nish | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | ZHANG Luke T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 5 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | GOLDADE Luke A. | D V D V V | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 6 | GODZHIK Zachary | D V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 8 | LAO Scott E. | V D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 9 | TSANG Matthew K. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 10 | YU Anders | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 11 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | BURKE Spencer W. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 13 | KIM Derek A. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 14 | LI Raphael C. | D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | WU Conrad J. | D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 16 | PIESNER Joshua C. | V D D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | XIAO EDWARD | V V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 18 | DARIANO Noah G. | V D V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 19 | HOBSON Aaron K. | V D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 20 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | D V V D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 21 | JAIN Aditya | D D V V D V | D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 22 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | V D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | CHEN Christopher | V V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | CHIN Julian S. | D D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 25 | ZHOU Oscar J. | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 26 | LE Jacob W. | D V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 27 | LI Ryan Z. | V D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 30 | AIBEL Hudson J. | D D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 31 | LAKE Wyatt J. | V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | ZENG Chuyi | D D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 33 | HOSKERI Anik S. | D V V D V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 34 | PIESNER Zachary C. | V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 35 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | V D V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 36 | MO Jason | V D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 37 | LI Peihong | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 38 | WONG Antonio | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 39 | LUH Ethan K. | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 40 | CHI Alexander | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 41 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 41 | ZHENG Zhe | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.