Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 26% |
| 2 | LIN Dashiell | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 3 | NGUYEN Nish | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 5 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 6 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 6 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 8 | LAO Scott E. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 9 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 10 | YU Anders | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 11 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 4% |
| 12 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 13 | KIM Derek A. | 1% | 9% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 14 | LI Raphael C. | - | 1% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 11% | |
| 15 | WU Conrad J. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 18 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 19 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 21 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
| 22 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | CHEN Christopher | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 25 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | 3% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | |
| 26 | LE Jacob W. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | LI Ryan Z. | 8% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 28 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 29 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 30 | AIBEL Hudson J. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 32 | ZENG Chuyi | 40% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 5% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 35 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | MO Jason | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 37 | LI Peihong | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | WONG Antonio | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | LUH Ethan K. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 40 | CHI Alexander | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 41 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | ZHENG Zhe | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.