South Gym of University of Minnesota RecWell - Minneapolis, MN, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RIECK Brennan | V D V V V D | V V V V V | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 2 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 3 | SIEDOW William | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 5 | HONEK Kyle | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | GLENNON Michael | V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | ROWLAND Marsden | V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 8 | BISSEN Quinn | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | XIONG Angelica | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 10 | LIMER Avi | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | TAKATA Benjamin | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 12 | HORAN Sean T. | D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 13 | OBERLY Nicholas | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | RHEA Eric L. | V V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 15 | KUNJAN Lena R. | V D V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 16 | SOTO Michael | D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 17 | JORGENSEN Kjirsten | D V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 18 | MINGO Joshua | V V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 19 | HAIRSTON Robert | V V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 20 | FRALEY Orion | D D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | FITZGERALD Thomas R. | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 22 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 23 | ELDRIDGE Hudson | D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 24 | HICKNER Gabe | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | STONE Ken | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | SMITH Bram | V D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | JORGENSEN Rebekah | D D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | GLASNAPP Mark | D V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 29 | CULVER Hannah | D V D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 30 | SANFORD Wesley | D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 31 | HARRIS Michael | V D D D D | V D | 4.3 | 1 | -3.3 |
| 32 | BENGTSON Jasmine | V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 33 | WILLER Ryan | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 34 | STENZEL Henry | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | JACOBSEN Alexander | D V D D D D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 | |
| 36 | MINNICH Oliver | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 37 | JOHNSON Andrew | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 38 | RHEA Evan | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 39 | HEBERT James | D D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.