South Gym of University of Minnesota RecWell - Minneapolis, MN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RIECK Brennan | V D V V V D | V V V V V | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 2 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 3 | SIEDOW William | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 5 | HONEK Kyle | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | GLENNON Michael | V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | ROWLAND Marsden | V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 8 | BISSEN Quinn | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | XIONG Angelica | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 10 | LIMER Avi | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | TAKATA Benjamin | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 12 | HORAN Sean T. | D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 13 | OBERLY Nicholas | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | RHEA Eric L. | V V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 15 | KUNJAN Lena R. | V D V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 16 | SOTO Michael | D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 17 | JORGENSEN Kjirsten | D V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 18 | MINGO Joshua | V V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 19 | HAIRSTON Robert | V V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 20 | FRALEY Orion | D D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | FITZGERALD Thomas R. | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 22 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 23 | ELDRIDGE Hudson | D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 24 | HICKNER Gabe | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | STONE Ken | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | SMITH Bram | V D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | JORGENSEN Rebekah | D D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | GLASNAPP Mark | D V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 29 | CULVER Hannah | D V D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 30 | SANFORD Wesley | D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 31 | HARRIS Michael | V D D D D | V D | 4.3 | 1 | -3.3 |
| 32 | BENGTSON Jasmine | V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 33 | WILLER Ryan | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 34 | STENZEL Henry | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | JACOBSEN Alexander | D V D D D D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 | |
| 36 | MINNICH Oliver | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 37 | JOHNSON Andrew | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 38 | RHEA Evan | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 39 | HEBERT James | D D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.