Kentucky International Convention Center - Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Youlong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% |
| 2 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
| 3 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
| 3 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 5 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 5% |
| 6 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 7% |
| 7 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% |
| 8 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
| 9 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 10 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 11 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 12 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 12 | YOON Junhyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 8% |
| 14 | CHEN Junlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 15 | LI Edison M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
| 16 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 13% |
| 17 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 17 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% |
| 19 | VADEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 19 | HAYES Stewart | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 19 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 4% |
| 22 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
| 23 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 24 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 25 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% |
| 26 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 27 | ZHOU Chenqiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 9% |
| 28 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 29 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 30 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% | 1% |
| 31 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 32 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 33 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 34 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 35 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 7% |
| 36 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 37 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 38 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 39 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 8% | - |
| 39 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 41 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 42 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 14% | 1% |
| 43 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 44 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 45 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 3% |
| 46 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 47 | SHIN Noah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 49 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 50 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 52 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SUAREZ David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 54 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | CHEN Nuo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 56 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 57 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 58 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 59 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 1% |
| 60 | NUCKLES Caden | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 61 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
| 62 | PE Noah | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 4% |
| 63 | LI Lucas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 65 | QU Richard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 66 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
| 67 | CHEN Anson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 68 | PARK William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 69 | STIRLING CHARLES | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 70 | WANDJI Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% |
| 71 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 72 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 73 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 74 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 75 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 76 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 77 | MCMILLIAN Harrison | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | NAIR Sujit | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 79 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
| 80 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 81 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 82 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 83 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 83 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 85 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 86 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 87 | LEE Jaden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 88 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 89 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 90 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 91 | YOU Martin | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 92 | HU Daniel | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 93 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 94 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 95 | FOY Grant | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 96 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 97 | WEI Winston | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 98 | JIN Andy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 99 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 100 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 101 | SHI Boris | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 102 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 103 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 104 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 105 | UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 106 | LIM EUNSEONG | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 107 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 107 | MIRON Ioachim | 100% | 94% | 58% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 109 | EDWARDS Connor | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 110 | LI Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 111 | HE Ian | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 112 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 113 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 114 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 115 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 116 | POPOKH Luca | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 117 | CHENG Mason | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 119 | YE Jerry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 120 | WEBSTER Liam | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 121 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 85% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 122 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 123 | HASTINGS Alex | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 123 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 125 | SHAW eric | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 125 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 67% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 127 | ROSE Zavier | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | YOUNG Jack | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 129 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 130 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 131 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 131 | KARLEKAR Ved | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 133 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 134 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 135 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 136 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 100% | 42% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 137 | TOMOV Evan | 100% | 72% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 138 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 89% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 139 | DAVIS Walter | 100% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 140 | SONG Yuxuan Austin | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 141 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 141 | DAVIS Thoren | 100% | 52% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 143 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 144 | WU Thomas | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 144 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 75% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 144 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 147 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 147 | GRIGORYAN Erik | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 149 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 149 | DELA CRUZ Lorenzo | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 151 | WEI-NAVARRO Augustus | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 151 | KARPMAN Benny | 100% | 77% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 153 | SGOUROS Keane | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.