Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | MORSE Tyler | V D D V V | V V V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 3 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | MOSES Alexander | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | PAINE Jared A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | RHYU Kozmo | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | LO Hung Yui | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 8 | XIAO Zherui | D V V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 10 | ZHU Max | V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 11 | LEHR William D. | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 12 | MARRAN Erik R. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | PARNAS Apollo | D D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 14 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | V V V D D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | V D D V V D | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 16 | FELDMAN Jaemin | D D D D D | V V D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 17 | HOLDERNESS Landon | D V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 18 | POCSVEILER Magor | V V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 20 | COOPER Rowan | V D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 21 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | DIB Aaniss | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 23 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | V V V D D V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 24 | CRANE Matthew T. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | CHUNG Thomas | V D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 26 | GOLDMAN Rami | D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | KIRSCH Adam J. | V D D V V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 28 | GREGORY Dean | V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 29 | JUSCINSKI Michal | V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 30 | HAN David | D D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 31 | PARNAS Ely | D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | ZHANG Yu | D D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 33 | WONG Daniel | V V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 34 | KIM Edward J. | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 35 | PHAM Ian Q. | D V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 36 | OBERLEITON Timothy | D D D V V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 37 | KROPP Jack | V V V D D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 38 | LI Sui Lun | D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 39 | JACKSON James | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 40 | LIU Yichen | V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 41 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 42 | GERSEN Jacob | D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 43 | THOMPSON Chester | D D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 44 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 45 | MARTIN Dirk | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 46 | WISE Timothy | D D V D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
| 47 | ZHANG Zan | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 48 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 49 | HONG James | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 50 | CHRISTIAN Alexander | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 51 | REITINGER Luke M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 52 | CHEN Zhong Han | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.