Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HART-SYED declan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
2 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
3 | ZHANG Hanru | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
3 | KAYE Ben | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
5 | SAMUEL Lucas | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
6 | SALEH Ali | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
7 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
8 | BAI Austin | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
9 | GRUNENWALD Henri | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
10 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
10 | HOLMES Alexiy | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 28% | |
12 | CZARNECKI Thomas | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
13 | KIM Daniel | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
14 | MARTIRE Luca | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
15 | LEE Aeden | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | GUGALA Frank | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
17 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 41% | 10% |
18 | NABASSOUA Djibril | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
19 | YAVENDITTI William | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
20 | CHANG Parker | - | - | 3% | 17% | 46% | 34% | |
21 | ONIK Ari N. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% | |
22 | KUO Phineas | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
23 | BAS Jonathan | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
24 | ULYSSE Jacob | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
25 | WANG Mendy | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
26 | LEONG Samuel | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
27 | LI Andrew | 3% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
28 | CARSELI Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 14% |
29 | ZHANG Julian | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
30 | KIAYIAS Alexander | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
31 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
32 | HUANG Dikang | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
33 | SIU Max | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
34 | LU Hansen | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 12% |
35 | CHEN kenneth | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
36 | BLACK Henry | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
37 | ZHANG Ethan | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
38 | JUVVADI Pratham | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | ZHANG Ethan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
40 | TANG Michael | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
41 | ZHENG Austin | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
41 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% |
43 | ROPER Griffin | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | PLOSSER Charlie | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
45 | MA Matthew | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
46 | CHOI Hunter | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
47 | LIU Jeremy | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
48 | LIU Yilin | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
49 | WANG Ancen | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
50 | BEYDOUN Sam | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
51 | CAO Joshua | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
52 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
53 | ZHONG Kingsley | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
54 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
55 | OH Joshua | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
56 | KOVACS Harrison | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
57 | SHAW eric | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
58 | HU Daniel | 1% | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
59 | HU Michael | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
60 | LIN Qianzhong | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
61 | YOUM Tyson | 9% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | YANG David H. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
63 | WANG Joshua | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
64 | SINCAVAGE Louis | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
65 | KOO Jaeha | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
66 | SHEN Lucas | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | HUYNH Kaleb | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
68 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 10% | 34% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
69 | MONDESIR Chace | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
70 | TAN Allen | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
71 | CHENG Karter | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
72 | SPERBER Miles | 20% | 42% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
73 | SHARMA Sharray | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
74 | OH Jiseok | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
75 | DENG Jonathan | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
76 | TIAN Dylan | 37% | 42% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
77 | JOHN Meru | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
78 | CHEN Timothy | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
78 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
80 | PRICE Ezra | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
81 | MOORE Maxton | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
82 | KOFMAN Daniel | 1% | 28% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.