Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% |
| 2 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 3 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 3 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 6 | SALEH Ali | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 11% |
| 7 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 8 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 9 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 12% |
| 10 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 10 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% | |
| 12 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 13 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 15 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 10% |
| 18 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
| 19 | YAVENDITTI William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% | |
| 21 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
| 22 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 23 | BAS Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 24 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 25 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 26 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | LI Andrew | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | CARSELI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% |
| 29 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 30 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 32 | HUANG Dikang | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 33 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 34 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 12% |
| 35 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 36 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 38 | JUVVADI Pratham | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 40 | TANG Michael | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% |
| 43 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 44 | PLOSSER Charlie | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 46 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 47 | LIU Jeremy | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LIU Yilin | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 50 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 51 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 54 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | OH Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 56 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 57 | SHAW eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | HU Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 59 | HU Michael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 60 | LIN Qianzhong | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 61 | YOUM Tyson | 100% | 91% | 63% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | YANG David H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 63 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | SINCAVAGE Louis | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | KOO Jaeha | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | SHEN Lucas | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 68 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 70 | TAN Allen | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 71 | CHENG Karter | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 72 | SPERBER Miles | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | SHARMA Sharray | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | OH Jiseok | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 77 | JOHN Meru | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 78 | CHEN Timothy | 100% | 95% | 76% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 78 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | PRICE Ezra | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 81 | MOORE Maxton | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | KOFMAN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.