Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 2 | MUN Michael K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 3 | NG Alexander M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 5 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 6 | LEVY Zachari I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | |
| 7 | MIELE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 8 | WEI Zikun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 9 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 10 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 11 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 12 | ALAIMO Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 13 | ZHU Wilson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 14 | JEONG Connor | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% | |
| 16 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | DINGMAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 18 | MAENG Jake W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 19 | WANG Nathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 20 | MANGELSDORF Anacan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 21 | SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 22 | COMER Daniel T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | MILAM Hugh | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | SCHENCK Theo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 25 | MOORE Thomas J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
| 26 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | WILKENS Zach Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | CHU Anthony | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | LEE Matthew C. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | JUNG Alexander | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | KOSLU Aidan D. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | SHOURIE Jai | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | VELO Juan Manuel H. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 38 | ZHU Max | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | ELMER Timothy H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 41 | HARRIS Roark S. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 43 | SOLTER Kai | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 44 | AHN Gus | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | KAJI Ty | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | ROMERO Caleb E. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | POCSVEILER Magor | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | LILLIAN Francis (Alex) (Alex) A. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | ARABACI Jack A. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | BORLAND Isaac | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | EASTMAN Blake C. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.