Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TRULL A.J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
2 | LEE Aiden | V D V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | CHEN Leonardo | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
3 | DUKO Phillip | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
5 | NORMILE Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | XIA Dashan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
7 | LIU Adam | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
8 | KARIMOV Amir | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
9 | HU Lucas | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | DOUBOV Andrew | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
11 | GAO Victor | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
12 | SINGLETON Aman | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
13 | BRADSHAW Carter | D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
14 | AHMED Mohsen | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
15 | ZHAI Avalo | V D V V D V | V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
16 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
17 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
18 | LI Jade | V V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
19 | TRAN Spencer | D V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
20 | SAVORETTI Pietro | D V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
21 | RVACHEV Michael | D V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
22 | LEE Aiden | V V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
23 | CLARE James | V V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
24 | CZEPLA Andrew | V V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
25 | ZHAO Liren | D V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
26 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | V D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
27 | KIM Zac | D V V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
28 | STARKIE Kitteridge | V D V D D V | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
29 | LI Ray | D V V V D D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
30 | CHEN Edward | V D D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
31 | KAPLAN Maddox | D D V D V D | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
32 | WANG Charles | D D D D V D | V V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
33 | CHEN Jayden | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
34 | WANG Tony | V V V V D V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
35 | YI Nathan | D V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
36 | SONG Changze | D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
37 | SCHAUER Oliver | V V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
38 | MIDYANY Evan | V D D V V V | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 | |
39 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | D V V V D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
40 | RIM Eugene | V D V D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
41 | NILSEN Mark | V V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
42 | MEHROTRA Neel | V V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
43 | LYCHKO Maksym | V V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
43 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | D D V D V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
45 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | V V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
46 | HELMY Richard | D D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
47 | LEE Anton | V D D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
48 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | D V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
49 | CUMMINGS Owen | D V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
50 | YANG Alex | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
51 | WARD Kofi | D V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
52 | TSIEN Richard | D D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
53 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | V D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
54 | THOMAS Ethan | V D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
55 | LI Morgan | D V D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
56 | HE Bronto | D D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
57 | SUN Lucas | D D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
58 | WENG ZOE | D V D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
59 | XIAO Yichen | D D D V D V | V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
60 | BENNETT Nathaniel | D D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
61 | ACAR Devin | D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
62 | BOUCHACOURT Arthur | V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
63 | PARIGIAN Alexander | D V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
64 | HEMPHILL Kurt | D D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
65 | CUK Max | D V D V D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
66 | BAZZANA Benji | D D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
67 | NG Nico | D D D V V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
68 | LEE Henry | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
69 | CUELLAR Markus | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
70 | LEE Wyatt | V V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
71 | ZHANG Jonathan | V D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
72 | NOOL Alexander | D D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
73 | DAVIS Kannon | V D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
74 | WANG Marcus | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
75 | HENNESSY Levon | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
76 | ZHAI Christopher | D V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
77 | LEE Kalvin | D D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
78 | GREEN Logan | D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
79 | YU David | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
80 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
81 | O'KEEFE Grady | D D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
82 | AGUIRRE Pablo | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
83 | BRESLAV Asher | V D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
84 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
85 | FOGEL Jake | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
86 | MEYERSON Ashton | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
87 | WANG Eason | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
88 | CHANG Ian | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
89 | BARATY Teagan | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.