St. Louis, MO - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 2 | REEVES Liam | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 3 | ROEVER Sean M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 3 | LIU Jacob B. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 5 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 6 | RAJPAL Alastair | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 7 | POLONSKI Anthony | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 8 | METTE Russell | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 10 | SPINA Joseph B. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
| 11 | KOKKER Thomas | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 12 | LAI Twayne | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | JI Aidan Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
| 14 | SMITH Cooper | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | CHOE Jayden K. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 18 | MARTIN Dexter | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 19 | THOMSON Champa | 2% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 21 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | MCCLURE Caleb W. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | PEREZ Santiago J. | 26% | 49% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | DAVIS Jace W. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | PARK Stephen | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | JOO Woobin | 6% | 42% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.