St. Louis, MO - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 2 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
| 3 | ROEVER Sean M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 3 | LIU Jacob B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 5 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 6 | RAJPAL Alastair | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 7 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | METTE Russell | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 9 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 10 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
| 11 | KOKKER Thomas | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 12 | LAI Twayne | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 13 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 14 | SMITH Cooper | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | CHOE Jayden K. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 18 | MARTIN Dexter | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 19 | THOMSON Champa | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | MCCLURE Caleb W. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 23 | PEREZ Santiago J. | 100% | 74% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | DAVIS Jace W. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 25 | PARK Stephen | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | JOO Woobin | 100% | 94% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.