Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEONG Connor | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 2 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 3 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 3 | MILAM Hugh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 5 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 6 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% |
| 7 | JUNG Alexander | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 8 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | ZHU Wilson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 10 | TAMEZ Carlos A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | MEINHOLD Li | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | LEVY Zachari I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 13 | SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | |
| 14 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 6% | |
| 15 | ALAIMO Charles | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | ZHU Max | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 17 | WANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
| 18 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 11% | |
| 19 | WEI Zikun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
| 20 | MOORE Thomas J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 21 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
| 22 | PAEK Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% | |
| 23 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 24 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | MIELE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 26 | LEE Matthew C. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 28 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 30 | BALLINGER Thomas D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | ROMERO Caleb E. | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | MATTIS George | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 35 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 37 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | MAENG Jake W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 39 | KOSLU Aidan D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 40 | POCSVEILER Magor | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | CHU Anthony | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 43 | KAJI Ty | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | COMER Alexander J. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 94% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | AHN Gus | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | ARABACI Jack A. | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 48 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | SOLTER Kai | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | ESTRADA Luke | 100% | 75% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | BORLAND Isaac | 100% | 74% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.