Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KANE Alexa | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
2 | XU Chenyu | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
3 | PEI Claire | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
3 | FU Shannon | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
5 | HALE Reagan | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
6 | YIP Allison | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
7 | YOUNG Nicole | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
8 | CAI Melody | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
9 | CHI Zoe | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
10 | KIM Vivian | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% | |
11 | CHO Jacey | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 9% | |
12 | XU Aasta | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - |
13 | ANDRUS Allie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 46% | 18% |
14 | LI Allison | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
15 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
16 | LIN Gianna | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
17 | LI Anna | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
18 | RAJ Indra | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
19 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
20 | ROMANOV Mia | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
21 | LI Carlie | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
22 | YU Xintong | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
23 | YU Chloe | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
24 | ILYAS Daanya | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | XIAO Ashley | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
26 | VARIPILLI Saanvika | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
27 | SUN Joanna | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
28 | OLSON Olivia | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
29 | FENG Esther | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
30 | KWON Claire | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
31 | VEGA-BRANDT Gabriella | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
32 | WANG Yvonne | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
33 | WANG Ailly | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
34 | ARNOLD Evangeline | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 6% |
35 | NEGRUT Sabina | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
36 | WEST Vivian | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
36 | SHI Elle | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
38 | LOO Samantha | 4% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | ZHANG Joy | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
40 | MUKKU Emily | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | XIONG Alice | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
42 | ZENG Joy | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
43 | HE Elsa | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
44 | YOUNG Penelope | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
45 | SRI Deetya | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
46 | KWON Allison | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
47 | TRIVULCE Scarlett | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
48 | ORGIS Rebecca | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
49 | YANG Nina | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
50 | CHONG Emma | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
51 | CHAN Faith Sum Yin | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
52 | BRINDAVAN Vyahriti | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
53 | HU Avery | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
54 | NISHANTH Krishvi | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
55 | PARKE Jaime | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
56 | WANG Phoebe | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
57 | COONEY Kyla | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
58 | BUZZINI Julia | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
59 | TUMULA Anima | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
60 | WANG Jenny | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
61 | KWAK Olivia | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
62 | XIE Zhiran (Celine) | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
63 | YADAGIRI Aditi | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | MARTINEZ Adeline | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
65 | YOON Claire | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
66 | HO evangeline | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
67 | LATAWA Navya | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | SHAH Aashi | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.