Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TAFOYA Devin D. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 2 | MCADOO Declan | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | STRAUSS Luke | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V V V D D | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 5 | GAO Zachary | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | DANIS Blake M. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | BRUNO Timothy | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | WEISS Mateo | D V D D V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 9 | CHOI Kaiden I. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 10 | GRAY Connor W. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 11 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 13 | AGGELER Donovan | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | MILEY Walker | D V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 15 | ISAACSON Calev | D D D V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 16 | BOYER Kai | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | BROOKS Justin | V V V D V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | SYKES Elynor | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | ISAACSON Henny | V D V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 20 | EYMAN Hans | D V V V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 21 | LEE Jayden J. | D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 22 | LI Grayson | D D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | PEARSON Heila | D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | ZHOU Austin | V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 25 | MUENKE Magnus | D D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 26 | LONG Sam | V D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | GADBURY Logan | V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | LEWIS Rachel | V D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | ZHU Riley | V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | MUENKE Torben | D D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 31 | SCHWITZER Eliot | D V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 32 | MARTEGANI Enea | D V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 33 | HANEY Kimberly M. | V D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 34 | SUN Neo | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 35 | LEWIS-RAMIREZ Ben | V V D D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 36 | FREEMAN Katherine | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 37 | WARD Zachary | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | STOY Sophia | D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 39 | REED Alexander | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 40 | EMERSON Zachary | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | GUIDA Haley | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 42 | BENENSON Hayes O. | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 43 | SCHNEIDER Ronan | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 44 | PEARSON Arwa | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 45 | TAPPAN Alden | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 46 | BLANCHARD Timothy | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.