Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 89% |
| 2 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 46% | 14% |
| 3 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 3 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 5 | HEDGES Philip S. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 6 | LICHTEN Keith H. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 7 | GAINES Aaron | - | - | - | 6% | 29% | 48% | 17% |
| 8 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 9 | CHENG Thomas | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 27% | 3% | |
| 10 | GATES Darcy C. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 11 | MCNAMARA Scott | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 12 | HABIB Farooq | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 34% | 8% | |
| 13 | MARSH Timothy G. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 1% | |
| 14 | BARREIRO Darren | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 15 | HELGE James R. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | COETZEE Frans M. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | CLAWSON Brian C. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 18 | GRAVES SMITH Geoffrey | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 47% | 25% |
| 19 | BUCKLEY Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 20 | MEEHAN Justin X. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
| 21 | HANSEN Eric J. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | |
| 21 | SUPONYA Sergey | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 18% | |
| 23 | HUNTER Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
| 24 | GERACI Paul A. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 1% | |
| 25 | PIENTA Chris J. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 26 | PRIHODKO Andrew | - | 9% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | SPRINGER Michael | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 28 | HITCHCOCK David | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 29 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | NUDELMAN Aleksandr | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | FREY Wayne N. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | BAILEY Creston P. | 15% | 43% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | HARRIS Robert S. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 34 | STEWART Robert | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | CHEN Steve | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 37 | KURITZ Marc M. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 38 | EXUM Travis H. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 13% | |
| 39 | ROBERTS Peter | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | - | 7% | 32% | 42% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | TEITENBERG John F. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 1% |
| 42 | WILLIAMS Brett | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ANDERSON Nathan T. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | - |
| 44 | KROGH Dan Krogh (Dan) M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 45 | PARTE Aidan | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 47 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 9% | 35% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | ARROWSMITH II Alan M. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | ELTERMAN Lev | 1% | 15% | 51% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | DJURISIC Zoran M. | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | RIFKIND Neil | 14% | 60% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | 13% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | KLINE R. Jay | 1% | 42% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | GREGORY Dean | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | BRUS Brian V. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 57 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | STERR Eric | 40% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | WU Robert | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | CAMPBELL Paul | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 61 | FRANGER Jeff | 40% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 62 | ROGERS John D. | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 63 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | FELDMAN Louis | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.