San Diego Jewish Academy - San Diego, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V D V V V D | V V V V V | 5.8 | 4 | -1.8 |
| 2 | CHIEN Brandon | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | LEE Royce | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 3 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 5 | FIECHTNER Thomas A. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | DILLON Anik | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 7 | THOMAS Michael | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 8 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | V V V V V V | V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 10 | LIANG Donny | V V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 11 | NORTON Henry | V V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | POSSON Luke | V V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 13 | HERBRANDSON Luke | V D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | V D V V V D | V D | 5.6 | 4 | -1.6 |
| 15 | DAVIDOVICH Eli | V V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 16 | ALLEN David | D V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 17 | ROMANO Ren | D V V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 18 | HARRIS Roark S. | D V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 19 | KOUTSOUKOS James | V V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 20 | CHOI Jung Jin | V D V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 21 | KURITZ Marc M. | D D D V V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 22 | LIANG Dong | D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 23 | SKILLENS Davin | V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 24 | TILLMAN Chase | D D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | WALSH Landon | V D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | SAMIMI Sina | D D V V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | SETTE Alessandro | D V D D D V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 28 | SOLONOVICH Maksim | V D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | NUGENT Curtis | D D D V V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 30 | DE LAUNEY Merric | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | HUANG Tony | D D D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 32 | HORN Evans | D D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 33 | KAGAN Gideon | D V D D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 34 | GAYLORD Ronan | D V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 35 | KENO Daniel | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | PICKETT Alexander | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 37 | SMITH Mason | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 38 | ROLAND Nikolas | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 39 | SANTOS Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 40 | TERRA BARRETT Isaiah | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.