Nittany Valley Sports Centre - State College, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHENG Logan | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | JIN Andy | D V V D V | V V V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 3 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | D V D V D | V V V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 3 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | D V V D V D | V V V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 5 | POLONI Giovanni | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | MILLER Dillon | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | SUN Henry | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 8 | PECK Quinn | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 9 | TAM Kyle | D V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | LEE Jason N. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 11 | ARANA Massimo | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | STAFFORD Gareth | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | TARCHICHI Robby | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 14 | NIECHWADOWICZ Michael | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 16 | KENNEDY christo | D V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 17 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 18 | HOLLIS Sean | D V V V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 19 | PEREZ Logan | V D V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 20 | WEI JR Shan | D V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 21 | KUO Phineas | V V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 22 | AMRANI David | D V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 23 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | V D V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 24 | KOVACS Harrison | V V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 25 | SHEA William | D V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 26 | YANG David H. | D D V V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 27 | MILLER Andrew | D D V V D V | V D | 5.4 | 3 | -2.4 |
| 28 | BAKSHI Aman | D D V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 29 | ABRAMKIN Tim | V D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | ABRAMSOHN Seth | D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | KAYE Ben | V V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 32 | POWELL Sean | V D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 33 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | V V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | MUNDAHL Brandon | V V D D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 35 | DESMOND Sterling | V D V D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 36 | LIM Charles | V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 37 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | V D D D V | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 | |
| 38 | ROJAS Elijah | D V D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 39 | PETERSON Lucas | D D V D D V | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 40 | DHANOA Kian | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 41 | NSUBUGA Jeffrey | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 42 | GODIN Willis | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 43 | BLACK Henry | V D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 44 | VALENTINE David | V V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 45 | GRANADOS Luis | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 46 | NAM Yunha | V D D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 47 | SABATINO Patrick | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 48 | MONTERROSO Sebastian | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 49 | CHING Ethan | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 50 | TOWNLEY Stephen | D D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
| 51 | JENKINS Michael | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 51 | BUNTON Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 53 | GALVAN Omar | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 54 | SINCAVAGE Louis | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.