Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DEMING Clare L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 2 | FOLEY Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 3 | ENOCHS Liz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 3 | ALTMAN Leigh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 6% | |
| 5 | JOHNSON Laura S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 6 | BERMAN Frauke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 12% |
| 7 | WILSON Dawn J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 8 | VANCE Beth S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
| 9 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | SMITH Chaz V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 16% |
| 11 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 12 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | SIERRA Kate | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 14 | KIM Nam Heui | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | GRAJALES Emily K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | LAPP Laurie E. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | OBLONSKY Natalia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 18 | DUNN Linda J. J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 18 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | 100% | 90% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | KING Robin E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 21 | MARENTES Blanca E. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | WILLEMSE Jamie | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 24 | GORDON Sharon | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LORANG Kim L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
| 27 | GOMES Gisela | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 28 | HANAMOTO Claire M. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | LUM Karen | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HAYWARD Tammy | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 32 | DEGEN Anita L. | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | DENNER Jasmina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | |
| 34 | WU Yik Chun | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 100% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | WALTER Joanne | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | MAUL Judy L. | 100% | 97% | 65% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | DUDLEY Gayle | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | WEBB Maud | 100% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | DAHL Naomi V. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.