Capitol Clash SYC/RCC & Y8

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, January 19, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 73%
2 HAYES Stewart 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 18%
3 CHEN Kyle P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
3 GHEDINI Luca 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 64%
5 SENIC Lucas 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93%
6 TANG Alexander L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 70%
6 SHENG Dalton 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 72%
8 CHENG Logan 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 47%
9 KO Caleb 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 24%
10 SIMONOV Timofey 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56%
11 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 72% 7%
11 ZENG Rick 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 64%
13 PALMA Nathan Anthony 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 56%
14 DOELL Ethan 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 57%
15 LI Edison M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 38%
16 ZHONG Maxwell 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 33%
17 PARRISH Evan 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 81%
18 YOON Junhyeok 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 63%
18 HUA Aaron 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 76% 27%
20 ZHENG Marcus 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 52%
20 MAZAHERI Fletcher 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61%
22 VADEN Oliver 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 85% 42%
23 WANDJI Noah 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 70%
24 PAN Ethan 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
25 SHIN Noah 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54% 13%
26 BAKSHI Aman 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 23% 2%
27 ZHANG Hanru 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 39% 2%
28 LIM EUNSEONG 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 56% 9%
28 LIU Aaron 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 4%
30 CHOI Benjamin 100% 100% 100% 99% 83% 34%
31 TANG Terry 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 30%
32 ONIK Ari N. 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 29% 4%
33 FEDELI Francesco 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 37%
34 BAI Austin 100% 100% 100% 96% 70% 15% -
35 WANG Caleb 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 12% 1%
36 GRUNENWALD Henri 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 20% 2%
37 ZHAI Derrick 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 32% 5%
38 FAN Ze Lin 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 30% 3%
39 XIE Jicheng 100% 100% 100% 94% 69% 30% 5%
40 JIN Andy 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 49% 10%
41 HAN Alexander 100% 100% 100% 99% 81% 32%
42 GRACEY Gavin 100% 100% 99% 84% 36% 5%
43 FANG Haoyu 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 22%
44 TANG Royce 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 49% 10%
45 KUO Phineas 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 13% 1%
45 HART-SYED declan 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 25% 4%
47 JIN Xuechong Daniel 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 19% 1%
47 GE Felix Fei 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 30% 5%
49 HOU Gaven 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 47% 8%
50 JAZWINSKI Ryan 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 12% 1%
51 ZHANG Julian 100% 99% 89% 60% 23% 4% -
52 LU Hansen 100% 100% 99% 86% 40% 8% 1%
53 CZARNECKI Thomas 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 29% 3%
54 LEE Junehyuk 100% 95% 71% 30% 4% -
55 WU Wallace 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 28%
56 TAN Charlie 100% 100% 97% 85% 52% 14%
57 SICAT Justin 100% 99% 92% 64% 21% 3%
58 LIU Anthony 100% 97% 80% 46% 14% 2%
59 YU William 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 52% 12%
60 MARTIRE Luca 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 15% 1%
61 WANG Elijah (QiChen) 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 34% 5%
62 SALEH Ali 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 16% 2%
63 ZHAI Alex 100% 100% 97% 78% 36% 6% -
64 LU Alex 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 40%
65 SIU Max 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 30% 3%
66 KARLEKAR Ved 100% 81% 40% 9% 1% -
67 KOVACS Harrison 100% 97% 80% 41% 9% 1%
68 NUCKLES Caden 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 14% 1%
69 NOVIKOV Yann 100% 100% 97% 81% 41% 9% -
69 HOLMES Alexiy 100% 100% 100% 97% 75% 32% 5%
71 CHANG Parker 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 29% 3%
72 HE Ryan 100% 99% 93% 67% 28% 5% -
73 CAO Joshua 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 11% 1%
74 TOOMRE Kai 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 49% 10%
75 SHAW Spencer 100% 100% 95% 76% 39% 10% 1%
76 GRIGORIEV Michael 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 23% 3%
77 YEVDAYEV Tamir 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 35% 3%
78 REN Ryan 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 9% -
79 WU Alexander 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 88%
80 YANG Steve 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 21% 2%
81 ZHANG Ethan 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 28% 4%
82 KIM Daniel 100% 98% 86% 54% 17% 1%
83 ULYSSE Jacob 100% 97% 78% 41% 11% 1%
84 LIU Alex 100% 100% 99% 93% 59% 19% 2%
85 WU Gengze (Daniel) 100% 98% 84% 52% 19% 3% -
86 LEE Thomas 100% 100% 98% 83% 48% 13% 1%
87 JIN Xueyuan George 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 11% 1%
88 LIU Yilin 100% 99% 83% 40% 9% 1% -
89 QU Zhida (richard) 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 24% 2%
90 DHOKTE Neev 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 23% 3%
90 XIE Jayden 100% 100% 95% 70% 31% 6% -
92 ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz 100% 97% 78% 43% 13% 2% -
93 HE Ian 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6% -
94 XIA Philip 100% 86% 51% 18% 4% - -
95 SONG Enoch 100% 99% 87% 54% 19% 3% -
96 CHUN Zachary 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1% -
97 LI Andrew 100% 92% 63% 27% 6% 1% -
98 LEONG Samuel 100% 100% 93% 64% 24% 4% -
99 PAN Howard Haoran 100% 95% 72% 36% 9% 1%
100 YANG David H. 100% 94% 66% 26% 3% -
101 OH Joshua 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1%
102 ZHENG Austin 100% 73% 29% 5% - -
102 KIM Ewan 100% 74% 30% 6% 1% -
104 SLAIN Owen 100% 98% 83% 48% 14% 1%
105 HU Daniel 100% 99% 89% 58% 18% 2% -
106 BOWLES Kevin 100% 98% 81% 35% 5% - -
107 XU Ryan 100% 96% 76% 40% 12% 1% -
108 CHAO ABU MINGZE 100% 97% 78% 39% 8% 1% -
109 DANTON Ryan 100% 99% 93% 66% 24% 4% -
110 XIANG Wangzhi 100% 89% 56% 21% 4% - -
111 LAM Kirin 100% 92% 60% 21% 3% - -
112 CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander 100% 98% 79% 24% 3% - -
112 WANG Jaaziel 100% 89% 50% 16% 3% - -
114 HOO Bezalel 100% 89% 51% 14% 2% - -
115 WILLIAMS Thomas 100% 70% 27% 5% - - -
116 DUROCHER Greyson 100% 77% 26% 3% - - -
117 KIAYIAS Alexander 100% 97% 81% 47% 16% 2% -
118 CHOW Kingsley 100% 97% 71% 19% 2% -
119 WEBER Andrew 100% 86% 46% 11% 1% -
120 ZHANG Ethan 100% 89% 53% 16% 2% -
121 MA Matthew 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1% -
122 HU Michael 100% 96% 75% 39% 11% 1% -
123 HUANG Jinyao 100% 99% 92% 57% 13% 1% -
124 LIN Wilson 100% 98% 83% 51% 17% 2% -
125 ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 5% -
126 LEE Aeden 100% 73% 32% 8% 1% - -
127 QIAN Henry 100% 99% 89% 63% 27% 6% -
128 KUBBA Krish 100% 75% 35% 9% 1% - -
129 HUANG Anthony 100% 90% 55% 17% 2% - -
130 SHEN Lucas 100% 83% 45% 14% 2% - -
131 MORALES Tycho 100% 93% 57% 17% 2% - -
132 ROBERTSON Liam 100% 76% 24% 3% - - -
133 JIANG Bohan 100% 99% 91% 59% 21% 3% -
134 TSENG Lucas 100% 96% 75% 39% 11% 1% -
134 MOON Nicolas 100% 73% 29% 5% - - -
136 MAZAHERI Theodore 100% 86% 50% 16% 3% - -
137 GUGALA Frank 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
137 MAZAHERI John 100% 97% 78% 43% 12% 1% -
139 CHIANG Aiden 100% 96% 72% 33% 8% 1% -
140 WANG Freyr 100% 89% 53% 16% 2% - -
141 HUYNH Kaleb 100% 92% 61% 22% 3% -
142 JORGE Elijah 100% 89% 52% 14% 2% -
143 STANSBURY Desmond 100% 83% 42% 10% 1% -
144 LIN Oliver Ju-En 100% 63% 15% 1% - -
145 CHEN Kevin 100% 65% 14% 1% - -
146 CHENUTULA Abhinav 100% 78% 29% 5% - - -
147 PARMAR Veer 100% 93% 48% 11% 1% - -
148 REBNER Parker 100% 92% 60% 21% 3% - -
149 SINCAVAGE Louis 100% 55% 12% 1% - - -
150 KIRK Royce 100% 97% 79% 38% 9% 1% -
151 COROZZO Robert 100% 43% 8% 1% - - -
152 CHAU Ivan 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% - -
153 KAZAKEVICH Kanstantsin 100% 49% 7% - - - -
154 MACK Julian 100% 54% 11% 1% - - -
155 CHEN Ethan 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% - -
156 RAMESH Prashvin 100% 96% 66% 24% 4% - -
157 SUN Andrew 100% 56% 13% 1% - - -
158 CAINE Liam 100% 54% 11% 1% - - -
159 MISHRA Kartikaye 100% 52% 13% 2% - - -
160 REYNOLDS CHANG Luke 100% 57% 15% 2% - - -
160 CHOI Hunter 100% 95% 65% 26% 5% - -
162 MCINTYRE Christopher 100% 93% 66% 28% 6% -
163 TANG Michael 100% 78% 38% 10% 1% -
164 XUAN nathan 100% 72% 16% 1% - - -
164 AYYAGARI Abhiram 100% 92% 63% 27% 6% 1% -
166 PACK Lindsey 100% 91% 53% 16% 3% - -
166 CHUNG Royce 100% 77% 27% 4% - - -
166 HAN Nathan 100% 77% 35% 9% 1% - -
169 PARK Jubin 100% 73% 29% 5% - -
170 PELTZER Liam 100% 90% 56% 18% 3% - -
171 RESENDE BONIFACIUK Lucas 100% 66% 22% 3% - - -
172 PAREKH Neil 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3% -
173 WEST Benjamin 100% 42% 7% 1% - - -
174 RATHMAN Bryce 100% 79% 40% 12% 2% - -
175 ASHMORE Jackson 100% 99% 91% 63% 24% 3% -
176 CHEN Tylar 100% 23% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.