Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | XIAO Zherui | V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 3 | CUMMINGS Kai W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | MOSES Alexander | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 5 | LAWLER Aidan | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 6 | BARRY Dominick | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | CHIEN Zachary M. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | MAKMATOV Vadim | D V V D V | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 9 | DAVIS Andrew | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | V V V V D V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 11 | NIXON Christian A. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | RODNEY Maxwell | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Derek | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 16 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 17 | MUNOZ Charles O. | V V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 18 | LIPTON Michael D. | V V V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 19 | WILMER Nik | V V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | NGUYEN Steven | D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 22 | PERSAUD Daivik | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | D V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | HAN David | D D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | D D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | YAO Shun | D V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 28 | JONES Dominic R. | V D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 29 | SMAY II Joseph E. | D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 30 | POSTMA Jacob | V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 31 | CHIZ Max H. | D D V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 32 | KOERBER Christopher T. | D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 33 | ZHAO Jonathan | V V D V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 34 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 35 | WILLIAMS Richard | V D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 36 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | D D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 37 | RICHARDSON Victor | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 38 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | V D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 39 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | D V V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 40 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 41 | BARAFF David | D D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 42 | BURCH Tristan H. | V D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 43 | SCHWARY Irv | D V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 44 | SPENCER Richard (Spenc) E. | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 45 | KUHN Jeffrey | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 46 | YOUNG Jr Colby | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 47 | FLY Paul | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 48 | SATTERWHITE William W. | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 49 | TRAN Travis | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 50 | LIN Austin S. | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 51 | RHEA Eric L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 51 | KIM Jeff | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 53 | WHITE Chance N. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 54 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.