Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
2 | XIAO Zherui | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
3 | CUMMINGS Kai W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 28% |
3 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
5 | LAWLER Aidan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
6 | BARRY Dominick | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
7 | CHIEN Zachary M. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
8 | MAKMATOV Vadim | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
9 | DAVIS Andrew | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
10 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
11 | NIXON Christian A. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
12 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
13 | RODNEY Maxwell | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
14 | WILLIAMS Derek | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
15 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
16 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
17 | MUNOZ Charles O. | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
18 | LIPTON Michael D. | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | WILMER Nik | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
20 | NGUYEN Steven | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
21 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
22 | PERSAUD Daivik | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
23 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
24 | HAN David | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
25 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
26 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
27 | YAO Shun | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
28 | JONES Dominic R. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
29 | SMAY II Joseph E. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
30 | POSTMA Jacob | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
31 | CHIZ Max H. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
32 | KOERBER Christopher T. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
33 | ZHAO Jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
34 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
35 | WILLIAMS Richard | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
36 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
37 | RICHARDSON Victor | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
38 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
39 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
40 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
41 | BARAFF David | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
42 | BURCH Tristan H. | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
43 | SCHWARY Irv | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | SPENCER Richard (Spenc) E. | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
45 | KUHN Jeffrey | 5% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
46 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 2% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
47 | FLY Paul | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
48 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
49 | TRAN Travis | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
50 | LIN Austin S. | 10% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
51 | RHEA Eric L. | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
51 | KIM Jeff | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
53 | WHITE Chance N. | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.