Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PECK Quinn | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 2 | METZ Mason | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | YU William | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | STRADOMSKYI Klim | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | HOLLIS Sean | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | GODIN Willis | V V V V D | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 7 | SHEA William | V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 8 | LACZIN Mark R. | V D V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 9 | DUSZA Zachery | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 11 | PRUT Anton | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | NAUGHTON Aidan | D V V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 14 | SHICK Veronika | V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | COSSROW Alex | V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 16 | CRAYTON Royce S. | D D V V D V | V D | 5.5 | 3 | -2.5 |
| 17 | CHANG Zane | V D V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 18 | BERGMANN Beatrix | V V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 19 | RUSANOV Oleg | V V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 20 | STANSBURY Desmond | D V V V V D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 21 | WESTGATE Rebecca | V V D V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 22 | CANDELARIA Armando | V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | MOORE Addisyn | D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 24 | MACKAY Ian | V V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 25 | NOVOTNY Felicia A. | D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | JEROME Trevor | D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 27 | RHEE Josiah | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | CHANG Xavier | D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | TSENG Lucas | V D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 31 | DAVIS Connor | D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 32 | DONOHUE Peter | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | MARTINEZ Rodrigo | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 34 | FOOR Jonathan | D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 35 | MARKERT Delaney | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | MYERS Kenneth | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | COLEMAN Samantha | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 37 | JAIN Dia | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 39 | SCHOEPFLE Carla | D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | RAMBHARAT Kheamraj | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 41 | STENSON Alyssa | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 42 | HONG Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.