Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PECK Quinn | - | - | 2% | 17% | 52% | 27% | 2% |
| 2 | METZ Mason | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% | |
| 3 | YU William | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 3 | STRADOMSKYI Klim | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 50% | 13% |
| 5 | HOLLIS Sean | - | - | 5% | 26% | 51% | 19% | |
| 6 | GODIN Willis | 1% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 7 | SHEA William | - | - | 1% | 15% | 55% | 29% | |
| 8 | LACZIN Mark R. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 9 | DUSZA Zachery | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 10 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | - | - | - | 5% | 42% | 53% | |
| 11 | PRUT Anton | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 12 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 38% | 1% | |
| 13 | NAUGHTON Aidan | 9% | 42% | 39% | 10% | - | ||
| 14 | SHICK Veronika | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 24% | 2% | |
| 15 | COSSROW Alex | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 16 | CRAYTON Royce S. | - | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 33% | 61% |
| 17 | CHANG Zane | 2% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | BERGMANN Beatrix | 22% | 47% | 27% | 4% | - | ||
| 19 | RUSANOV Oleg | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 43% | ||
| 20 | STANSBURY Desmond | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | WESTGATE Rebecca | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | CANDELARIA Armando | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | MOORE Addisyn | 8% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | MACKAY Ian | - | 6% | 30% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
| 25 | NOVOTNY Felicia A. | 6% | 40% | 45% | 9% | - | - | |
| 26 | JEROME Trevor | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 27 | RHEE Josiah | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | CHANG Xavier | 1% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | TSENG Lucas | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 30 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | - | < 1% | 14% | 54% | 33% | ||
| 31 | DAVIS Connor | 1% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | DONOHUE Peter | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | MARTINEZ Rodrigo | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | FOOR Jonathan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 35 | MARKERT Delaney | 26% | 50% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 36 | MYERS Kenneth | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | COLEMAN Samantha | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | JAIN Dia | 38% | 45% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | SCHOEPFLE Carla | 28% | 56% | 15% | 1% | - | ||
| 40 | RAMBHARAT Kheamraj | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | STENSON Alyssa | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | HONG Nathan | 16% | 44% | 32% | 8% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.