Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LU Brandon | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 2 | CREMEL Remi | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 3 | TURBAT Travis | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 3 | JIN Yucheng | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 5 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 6 | LIN Sampson | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 7 | WANG Eason | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 8 | XIE Raymond | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 9 | PARK Avan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 10 | SINGH Reyaansh | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | SUN Roy | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
| 12 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 13 | TAN benjamin | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
| 14 | FOO Kingston | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 15 | LIN Dylan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 16 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | LI Mason | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 20% | 2% |
| 18 | ZHANG William | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 19 | KAJITA Grayson | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 43% | 10% |
| 20 | YIN Luke | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | CAO Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | XU Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | ZHANG Benjamin | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | MENG Eric | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | BAGWELL Theodore | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | FUNG Lucas | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 27 | CHEN Rylan | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | KORKUNOV Alexander | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | THIMIRI Trishaan | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 30 | CREMEL Louis | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 31 | MENG Andy | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 32 | CHANG Owen | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 33 | FAZIO Lorenzo | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | TROYANKER Makar | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHANG Bryant | 29% | 46% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | NGO Lincoln | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | LEE Reiden | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | KHANDAN MILAN | 14% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | XU Benjamin | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | FUNG Caleb | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WU William | 18% | 45% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 42 | RUDENKO Zhdan | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.