2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 19 | 14 | - | - | - | 33 |
Losses | 40 | 12 | - | - | - | 52 |
Win Ratio | 32.2% | 53.8% | - | - | - | 38.8% |
Pool Victories | 14 | 12 | - | - | - | 26 |
Pool Losses | 32 | 8 | - | - | - | 40 |
Pool Win Ratio | 30.4% | 60.0% | - | - | - | 39.4% |
DE Victories | 5 | 2 | - | - | - | 7 |
DE Losses | 8 | 4 | - | - | - | 12 |
DE Win Ratio | 38.5% | 33.3% | - | - | - | 36.8% |
Note: Seasons start on August 1st and end on July 31st.
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Easy wins† | 6 | 2 | - | - | - | 8 |
Easy wins as % of wins | 31.6% | 14.3% | - | - | - | 24.2% |
Close wins‡ | 7 | 6 | - | - | - | 13 |
Close wins as % of all wins | 36.8% | 42.9% | - | - | - | 39.4% |
Close losses‡ | 7 | 4 | - | - | - | 11 |
Close losses as % of all losses | 17.5% | 33.3% | - | - | - | 21.2% |
Big losses† | 26 | 4 | - | - | - | 30 |
Big losses as % of all losses | 65.0% | 33.3% | - | - | - | 57.7% |
† Easy victories or big losses are those with the score difference of 4 or more touches in a pool, 7 or
more touches in direct elimination, and 5 or more in veteran and youth direct elimination.
‡ Close bouts are those with the score difference of 1 or fewer touches in a pool, 3 or
fewer touches in direct elimination, or 2 or fewer touches in veteran or youth direct elimination.
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 5 |
Victories as % of all victories | 10.5% | 21.4% | - | - | - | 15.2% |
Losses | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | 3 |
Losses as % of all losses | 2.5% | 16.7% | - | - | - | 5.8% |
Total | 3 | 5 | - | - | - | 8 |
Total as % of all bouts | 5.1% | 19.2% | - | - | - | 9.4% |
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Events | 8 | 4 | - | - | - | 12 |
Tournaments | 7 | 4 | - | - | - | 11 |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 4:5 | CREMEL Louis | 36 | U | 34 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 119 | 351 | 30.7 | 65% | ||
Pool | W | 4:3 | TAN benjamin | 7 | 39 | U | 21 | LA International Fencing | 1117 | 321 | 50.6 | 10% | |
Pool | L | 1:5 | CHEN Kyle | 6 | 37 | U | 9 | 1551 | 371 | 1.8 | 3% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | SINGH Reyaansh | 18 | 80 | U | 13 | Prime Fencing Academy | 830 | 369 | 10.6 | 23% | |
Pool | L | 4:5 | RUDENKO Zhdan | 31 | U | 24 | Elite Fencing Club | 328 | 359 | 20.5 | 52% | ||
T64 | W | 10:3 | XIAO Albert | 27 | U | 37 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 1691 | 1088 | 86.4 | 24% | ||
T32 | L | 7:10 | LI Lief | 16 | 76 | U | 7 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 1467 | 1174 | 45.8 | 32% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 0:5 | PARK Kaiden | 11 | U | 15 | Precision Athletics Fencing Club | 1257 | 353 | 4.5 | 7% | ||
Pool | W | 3:2 | LUO Derren | 23 | U | 26 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 97 | 348 | 16.9 | 66% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | CHEN Kyle | 6 | 120 | U | 2 | 1555 | 365 | 1.9 | 3% | ||
Pool | L | 1:5 | WANG Eason | 14 | U | 8 | SoCAL Fencing Center | 1067 | 363 | 7.0 | 12% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | GUO Austin | 3 | 95 | U | 3 | LA International Fencing | 1407 | 356 | 2.8 | 4% | |
Pool | L | 0:5 | LU Brandon | 19 | U | 5 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 1476 | 354 | 2.2 | 3% | ||
T32 | L | 1:15 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 2 | 56 | U | 11 | Orange County International Fencers Club | 1924 | 1107 | 18.9 | 10% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 0:5 | SUN Lucas | 11 | U | 3 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 821 | 277 | 11.5 | 19% | ||
Pool | W | 5:4 | MOK Jason | 1 | U | 27 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | -362 | 266 | 9.6 | 84% | ||
Pool | W | 5:4 | TUNG Alison | 21 | U | 29 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:4 | SPICER-YOUAKIM Benjamin | 17 | U | 17 | West Berkeley Fencing Club | 290 | 275 | 26.6 | 49% | ||
Pool | W | 5:4 | WANG Ian | 20 | U | 15 | Maximum Fencing Club | 486 | 302 | 31.8 | 38% | ||
Pool | W | 5:1 | KAUDER Rourke | 10 | U | 22 | The Fencing Center | 260 | 333 | 19.4 | 54% | ||
T32 | W | 10:5 | MOK Jason | 1 | U | 27 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 493 | 1111 | 33.0 | 80% | ||
T16 | W | 10:4 | LIN Tiffany | 25 | U | 12 | Prime Fencing Academy | ||||||
T8 | L | 7:8 | RAJ Yojith | 30 | U | 1 | Maximum Fencing Club | 1656 | 1144 | 37.5 | 22% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 3:5 | LEE Roland | 37 | U | 30 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 288 | 233 | 30.4 | 46% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | BAGWELL Theodore | 35 | U | 24 | LA International Fencing | 526 | 203 | 46.0 | 30% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | EVANS Desmond | 4 | 14 | U | 3 | Marin Fencing Academy LLC | 1629 | 249 | 1.2 | 1% | |
Pool | L | 2:5 | SINGH Shiv | 28 | U | 45 | Prime Fencing Academy | 365 | 247 | 24.0 | 43% | ||
Pool | W | 5:2 | LEUNG Joon | 45 | U | 32 | Maximum Fencing Club | 1015 | 223 | 64.1 | 10% | ||
Pool | L | 1:5 | SHENOY Neil | 13 | 61 | U | 11 | Bay Area Fencing Club / Bay Area Fencing Club Pleasanton | 885 | 288 | 10.5 | 17% | |
T64 | W | 10:6 | LEE Reiden | 39 | U | 34 | Maximum Fencing Club | 1145 | 1016 | 111.3 | 42% | ||
T32 | L | 3:10 | LU Brandon | 3 | 12 | U | 3 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 2088 | 1127 | 16.1 | 7% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 5:2 | DONG YIKUN | 29 | U | 64 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 202 | 302 | 34.4 | 56% | ||
Pool | L | 4:5 | LIN Evan | 96 | U | 61 | Socal Fencing Center | 509 | 336 | 29.4 | 39% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | WANG Ian | 59 | U | 40 | Maximum Fencing Club | 478 | 307 | 28.3 | 39% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | NGO Lincoln | 57 | U | 66 | Swordplay LA | 295 | 279 | 34.2 | 49% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | WU Wallace | 1 | 1 | E24 | 1 | Fencers Club Inc. | 2001 | 245 | 0.3 | < 1% | |
Pool | L | 0:5 | KAJITA Grayson | 85 | U | 25 | Massialas Foundation (M Team) | 901 | 244 | 11.1 | 14% | ||
T128 | L | 8:10 | LIN Zhengxuan | 60 | U | 48 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 1292 | 1097 | 81.6 | 39% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 1:5 | LIN Dylan | 11 | U | 9 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 509 | 362 | 37.2 | 41% | ||
Pool | W | 5:0 | TUNG Alison | 1 | U | 29 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:1 | XIAO Albert | 20 | U | 24 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 329 | 324 | 35.6 | 50% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | KIM Rylie | 29 | U | 1 | Maximum Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | L | 2:5 | XIE Garrett | 30 | U | 13 | Prime Fencing Academy | 51 | 360 | 58.0 | 69% | ||
T32 | W | 10:9 | ZENG Cayden | 28 | U | 19 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 890 | 998 | 99.6 | 56% | ||
T16 | L | 5:10 | KIM Rylie | 29 | U | 1 | Maximum Fencing Club |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 4:5 | LIN Dylan | 44 | U | 23 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 462 | 446 | 59.5 | 49% | ||
Pool | L | 1:5 | HUANG Owen | 14 | U | 7 | Socal Fencing Center | 979 | 387 | 22.1 | 17% | ||
Pool | L | 1:5 | LU Brandon | 3 | 13 | U | 1 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 1339 | 365 | 8.8 | 6% | |
Pool | W | 5:3 | DULAI Hukam | 35 | U | 50 | Fresno Fencing Club | 535 | 356 | 65.2 | 39% | ||
Pool | L | 4:5 | SINGH Reyaansh | 18 | U | 15 | Prime Fencing Academy | 724 | 421 | 32.1 | 32% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | CHANG Owen | 30 | U | 26 | Precision Athletics Fencing Club | 764 | 389 | 27.3 | 28% | ||
T64 | L | 5:10 | YIN Luke | 24 | U | 22 | Socal Fencing Center | 1338 | 1097 | 99.1 | 37% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 1:5 | LI Yunze | 21 | U | 16 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 1213 | 558 | 30.8 | 16% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | CHEN Alwyn | 30 | U | 31 | 233 | 527 | 52.3 | 67% | |||
Pool | L | 0:5 | LI Lief | 26 | U | 14 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 935 | 580 | 45.8 | 29% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | WU Vincent Moxiao | 22 | U | 5 | 975 | 534 | 36.9 | 25% | |||
Pool | L | 0:5 | YU Ethan | 11 | U | 17 | 845 | 497 | 40.5 | 29% | |||
Pool | L | 2:5 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 1 | 4 | U | 7 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 1427 | 457 | 10.4 | 6% | |
T32 | L | 0:10 | YANG Steve | 2 | 9 | U | 2 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 1805 | 1157 | 59.7 | 18% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 5:3 | JUSON Julianne Lauren | 2 | U | 18 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | ||||||
Pool | L | 1:5 | ZHANG Annabelle | 5 | U | 11 | Maximum Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:0 | MANUBOLU Maanvi | 8 | U | 20 | Bay Area Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:4 | VAIL Maisie | 18 | U | 5 | Marin Fencing Academy LLC | ||||||
Pool | L | 2:5 | LAU Terrence | 20 | U | 3 | Maximum Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:2 | LIN Tiffany | 11 | U | 12 | Prime Fencing Academy | ||||||
T16 | L | 3:10 | LIU Anya | 12 | U | 8 | Rain City Fencing Center |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 4:5 | LI Ethan | 1 | U | 6 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 23 | 1053 | 341.1 | 93% | ||
Pool | W | 4:3 | XIE Garrett | 11 | U | 2 | Prime Fencing Academy | 247 | 712 | 59.5 | 75% | ||
Pool | L | 4:5 | YUNG Nathan | 5 | U | 5 | Halberstadt Fencers' Club | 379 | 771 | 145.7 | 71% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | SCHOR Katherine | 4 | U | 8 | Maximum Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | L | 1:5 | YANG Jaron | 9 | U | 3 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 862 | 625 | 67.4 | 36% | ||
T16 | W | 10:6 | CHENG Adrian | 2 | U | 11 | 2500 | 1119 | 304.7 | 11% | |||
T8 | L | 9:10 | LI Mason | 10 | U | 3 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 1027 | 1424 | 266.8 | 70% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 3:4 | LI Mason | 5 | U | 1 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 444 | 1467 | 511.9 | 91% | ||
Pool | W | 5:1 | KOLENIC Chance | 3 | U | 3 | Marin Fencing Academy | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:4 | LI Ethan | 2 | U | 2 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 27 | 955 | 39.2 | 90% | ||
Pool | W | 5:2 | LIN Ellis | 1 | U | 5 | Bay Area Fencing Club Pleasanton / Bay Area Fencing Club | 308 | 995 | 58.1 | 80% | ||
T4 | L | 7:10 | LI Ethan | 2 | U | 2 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 1055 | 1536 | 417.0 | 72% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 2:5 | LIN Tiffany | 6 | U | 6 | Prime Fencing Academy | ||||||
Pool | W | 4:3 | ZENG Cayden | 7 | U | 10 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 1390 | 2500 | 180.8 | 84% | ||
Pool | W | 5:2 | YANG Jaron | 12 | U | 1 | Bay Area Fencing Club | 766 | 2681 | 33.0 | 98% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | LEE Reiden | 2 | U | 3 | Maximum Fencing Club | 777 | 2714 | 1338.9 | 98% | ||
Pool | W | 5:4 | ZHANG Bryant | 10 | U | 12 | Maximum Fencing Club / Saratoga Fencing Club | 593 | 1375 | 92.4 | 81% | ||
T16 | W | 8:7 | XIE Garrett | 11 | U | 11 | Prime Fencing Academy | 1124 | 2500 | 131.2 | 89% | ||
T8 | L | 3:9 | LEE Reiden | 2 | U | 3 | Maximum Fencing Club | 1247 | 2631 | 1095.4 | 92% |