Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
2 | HUANG Holmes (Shengheng) | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
3 | OZAWA Taishi | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | GE Felix Fei | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
5 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | CHENG Logan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
7 | LIU Aaron | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
8 | ZHENG Marcus | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
9 | LU Alex | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
9 | LU Jingyi | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
11 | DESERANNO Leander | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
12 | FANG Haoyu | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
13 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
14 | LIU Alex | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
15 | BIELER Mason | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
16 | CZARNECKI Thomas | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
17 | ZHAI Alex | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
18 | PAN Ethan | V V V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
19 | LATORRE Leonardo | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
20 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | V V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
21 | BAI Austin | D V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
22 | ABRAMKIN Tim | V V D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
23 | EDWARDS Connor | V V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
24 | LEE Abin | D V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
25 | WANG Caleb | D D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
26 | PAN Howard Haoran | V V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
27 | NUCKLES Caden | V V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
28 | CHANG Parker | V V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
29 | COOK Grant | V D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
30 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | V D D D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
31 | FAN Ze Lin | V D D D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
32 | WANG Mendy | D V D V D D | V V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
33 | CAO Justin | D V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
34 | YANG David H. | V V V V V D | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
35 | HONG Derek | V V V D V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
36 | ZHAO Jason | V D D V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
37 | ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) | V D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
38 | GANAPATHI Eshan | D V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
39 | KAGAN Noah | V D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
40 | LAM Kirin | D V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
41 | CHIANG Aiden | D D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
42 | HUYNH Matthew | D V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
43 | CHENG Mason | D D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
44 | MAZAHERI John | V D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
45 | ZENG Albert | D V V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
45 | WENGER Liam | D V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
47 | KNIBBE Nathan | V V D D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
48 | MORALES Tycho | D D V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
49 | NG Kai | V D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
50 | CHUNG Royce | V V D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
51 | JIN Xueyuan George | D V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
52 | SU Aiden | D V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
53 | WU Rayson siyu | D V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
54 | YOUM Tyson | V D V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
55 | GREULICH Nikolas | V D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
56 | CHOI Hunter | V D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
57 | SLAIN Owen | V D D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
58 | KUBBA Krish | D V D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
59 | MADDES Gage | D D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
60 | QIAN Henry | D D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
61 | CHOW Kingsley | V V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
62 | SONG Enoch | D V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
63 | WANG Freyr | D V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
64 | WENGER Rowan | D D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
65 | ZMUDA Aiden | V D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
66 | ROUS Miguel | D V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
67 | MARVEL Elliot | D D V V D D | D | 0.2 | 2 | +1.8 |
68 | WANG Jaaziel | D V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
69 | SHAW Spencer | V D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
70 | MAZAHERI Theodore | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
70 | CHAO ABU MINGZE | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
72 | DEBORD Beckett | D D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
73 | VARRE Rishi | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
74 | KOLACKI Gabriel | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
75 | CHEN Varick | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
76 | HARDWICK Alex | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
77 | XUE Lucas | D V D D D D | 1.0 | 1 | - | |
78 | XU Jason | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
79 | LI Eric | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
80 | XIE Ethan | D V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
81 | HUYNH Kaleb | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
82 | DENG Albert | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
83 | CHAU Ivan | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
84 | HOARE Gabriel | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
85 | LUND Jonah | D D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
86 | RITTER Nathan D. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
87 | WANG kevin | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
88 | WILLIAMS Thomas | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
88 | VOGEL Rylan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
90 | BEIER Rowan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
91 | TAGORE Ayansh | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.