Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
2 | LU Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
3 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
3 | PARK Gi Beom | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
5 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% |
6 | YANG Steve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
7 | JIN George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
8 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
9 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
10 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
11 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
11 | TAO Jiemi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 40% |
13 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
14 | YU Jinyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
15 | TURBAT Travis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
16 | XIE Raymond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 11% |
17 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
18 | LI Lief | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
19 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
20 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
21 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
22 | PESKIN Kepler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
23 | SINGH Reyaansh | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
24 | SUN Roy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
25 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
25 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% | |
27 | MCCOOL Henry | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
28 | JIN Yucheng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
29 | FOO Kingston | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
30 | LIN Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% | 2% |
31 | WU Vincent Moxiao | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
32 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
33 | PARK Avan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
34 | YANG Luca | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
35 | ZHANG Kyle J | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 18% |
36 | SINGH Jai Anand | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
37 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
38 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
39 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 10% | |
40 | LAM Lazarus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
41 | WILSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 6% |
42 | YU Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
43 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
44 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
45 | WU Yulen | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
46 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
47 | FANG Lionel | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
48 | XU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
49 | MADDES Gage | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
50 | TAN benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
51 | KIM Kanghyun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
52 | CHEN Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
53 | SUAREZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
54 | DHALIWAL Zorawar Singh | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
55 | LI Yunze | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | - |
56 | JIANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
57 | CHEN Kyler | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% | |
58 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
59 | OH Dongha | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
60 | WU Connor | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
61 | YIN Andrew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
62 | SHENOY Neil | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
63 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
64 | LIN Stewart | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
65 | HOFFMAN Zane | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
66 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
67 | BAIER Leon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
68 | BUCHNER Roland | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
69 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
70 | XU ETHAN | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
71 | LIU Bradley | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
72 | MENG Andy | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
73 | SU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
74 | LI Mason | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 1% | |
75 | LIU Mason | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
76 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
77 | YOON Mason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
78 | ZHANG Charlie | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
79 | KUTATELADZE Danieli | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
79 | GU Evan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | YAN Aaron | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
82 | PARK Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
83 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
84 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
85 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | |
86 | KIM JOSHUA | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
87 | JIANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
88 | GRIFFIN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
89 | MENG Eric | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
90 | HUANG Owen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 7% | - |
91 | LIGERET Leo | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
92 | HYUN Francis | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
93 | DING Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
94 | THIMIRI Trishaan | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
95 | YUAN Derek | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
96 | LIN Dylan | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | |
97 | GASPARRO JJ | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
98 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
99 | RAJ Yojith | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
100 | KIM ISAAC | 100% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
101 | XU Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
102 | HUA Isaac | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - |
103 | WONG Sebastian | 100% | 57% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
104 | LIM Cayden | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
105 | DONG YIKUN | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
106 | LEE Reiden | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
107 | WU KADEN | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
107 | SIN Hwan | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
109 | NGO Lincoln | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
110 | LEE Sung-Yull | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
111 | MILLIMAN August | 100% | 95% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
112 | PAGNIELLO Francesco | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
112 | CHU Joe | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
114 | BROD Baylin | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
114 | LEVKOVICH Milan | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
116 | HOFFMAN Sacha | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
117 | GUTKOVSKIY Ryan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
118 | LEE Joseph | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
119 | HOLLANDER Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
119 | ZUO Thomas | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
121 | XU Benjamin | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
122 | AN Jacob | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
123 | WU Kangdi | 100% | 72% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
124 | SUSSMAN Gabriel | 100% | 88% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
125 | LU Jason | 100% | 81% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
125 | ZMUDA Brady | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
127 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
128 | WANG Owen | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.