National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 2 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 3 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 21% | |
| 3 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% |
| 5 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 6 | HUTH Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 7 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 8 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% | |
| 9 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 17% | |
| 10 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 11 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 12 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
| 14 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 16 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 10% | |
| 17 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 18 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
| 18 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 20 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 21 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 23 | CHO Ethan H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 26 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | XIAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | PERSINGER Charles B. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | AROUH Dylan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | PARK John L. | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | LI Matthew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Alex | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | TANG Terry | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 49% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | HONG Logan | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BROWNING Michael | 100% | 66% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | SHELDON Owen | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 42 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MCLENDON Dario | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | XIE Eric | 100% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% | 37% | 7% | |
| 48 | CATINO William | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | JONES Jackson | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | BESSELMAN Noah | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | SONG Tony | 100% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | KOE Beckett | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ZDAN Dominic | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.