National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% |
2 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
3 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
3 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
5 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
5 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 8% |
7 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% |
8 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
9 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
10 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 23% |
11 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
12 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 4% |
13 | PALMER Meredith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 16% |
14 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
15 | VIANNA Gabriella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% |
16 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 13% | |
17 | MICHAELSEN Emily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 6% |
18 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% |
19 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
20 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 5% |
21 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | < 1% | - |
22 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
23 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
24 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
25 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
26 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
27 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 8% |
28 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
29 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
30 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 17% |
31 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
32 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 5% |
33 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
34 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 12% |
35 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
36 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
37 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
38 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
38 | MI Anning | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - |
40 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 9% |
41 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
42 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
43 | LIN Emma | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - |
44 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 5% | - | - |
45 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
46 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - |
48 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
49 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
50 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
52 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
53 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
54 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - |
55 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
56 | NORTH Zoe M. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
58 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | |
59 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
60 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 3% |
61 | FU Qihan | 100% | 97% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
62 | SU Michelle | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
63 | LEE Fiona E. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
64 | DAVIES Ellie | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
66 | LABELLE Audreanne | 100% | 86% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
67 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% |
70 | SHELDON Lucy A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
71 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
72 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
73 | STAIKOS Eleni | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
74 | WEI Vika | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
75 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
76 | ROY Layla | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
77 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
77 | WANG Cynthia | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
79 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
80 | DATLA Meha | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | - | - | - |
81 | LANIER Isabelle R. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
82 | DATLA Medha | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
83 | SMITH Emilee E. | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
84 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - |
85 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
86 | KOGAN Stella | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
87 | PISHARODI smriti | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
88 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
89 | DEGENHOLTZ Annabel G. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
89 | QIAN Zhiyan | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
91 | FURST Chloe | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
92 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 77% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
93 | KOGAN Alexis | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
94 | RICHMAN Sofia | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
95 | MULLENS Erin | 100% | 95% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
96 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
96 | MAHNKEN Rachel | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.