Tufts University - Medford, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | ||
| 1 | MAZUR Daniil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 95% | 88% | 75% | 58% | 38% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 1% | < 1% | - | ||
| 2 | HADDAD Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 95% | 88% | 75% | 57% | 37% | 19% | 8% | 2% | - | - | |
| 3 | IMREK Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 94% | 87% | 74% | 57% | 38% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
| 4 | LIVERANT Skyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 89% | 78% | 61% | 42% | 25% | 12% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 6 | LAWSON Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 94% | 86% | 74% | 56% | 38% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
| 7 | ZHANG Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 91% | 79% | 62% | 41% | 22% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | ||
| 8 | KUSHNERIK Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 94% | 86% | 72% | 54% | 35% | 19% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 10 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 90% | 78% | 62% | 43% | 27% | 14% | 6% | 2% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | YU Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 94% | 86% | 72% | 55% | 36% | 20% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | NORTH Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 91% | 79% | 61% | 41% | 23% | 11% | 5% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 13 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 88% | 70% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - | - | ||||||||||
| 14 | WEISE Eli | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 34% | 13% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| 15 | TAFUR Alexander | 100% | 99% | 96% | 84% | 61% | 35% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - | - | |||||||||||
| 16 | COLLYMORE Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 47% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |||||||||||
| 17 | LIU Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 85% | 63% | 35% | 12% | 2% | ||||||||||
| 18 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 69% | 40% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - | |||||||||||
| 19 | LONCAR Luka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 81% | 60% | 35% | 15% | 5% | 1% | - | - | ||||||||||
| 20 | LI Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 92% | 78% | 56% | 33% | 16% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
| 21 | ZHU Wilson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 85% | 66% | 42% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - | |||||||||
| 22 | HUGHES Levi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |||||||||||||||
| 23 | HUANG Thomas | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||||
| 24 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | ||||||||||||||||
| 25 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | |||||||||||||||
| 26 | SHAMIS Mark | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |||||||||||||||
| 27 | MURPHY Thomas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - | |||||||||||||||
| 28 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 7% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 29 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 41% | 7% | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
| 30 | YU Hunter | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| 31 | GRAMS Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% | ||||||||||||||||
| 32 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||||
| 32 | PONIKVAR Lars | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 61% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| 34 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| 35 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | ||||||||||||||||
| 36 | JAMISON Harper | 100% | 99% | 60% | 15% | 1% | |||||||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.