Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 2 | YOON Ian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 3 | GEVA Reuben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 3 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 5 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | |
| 6 | LI Stephen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 20% |
| 7 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 8 | ZHOU Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
| 9 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 10 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 11 | PARK Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% |
| 12 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | LI Vance | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 14 | BUTLER Xavier | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 15 | FAYEZ Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 16 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 17 | ZHANG Jenson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 18 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | YU Rex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 21 | KHALID Ilyas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 22 | YOU Asher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 23 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 24 | SHIM Jaeyoo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 25 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 25 | HOLDEN Harrison | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | PAGLIARINI James | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 28 | REN Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 28 | MODI Vihaan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | NG Remy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 31 | MAXWELL Taiga | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | YAN Milan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 34 | DESAI Jairaj | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | LEUNG Joon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 36 | SI Alexander | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | TALANDZEVICIUS Tomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 38 | GAO Guanyi (Jonathan) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 39 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| 39 | DUCHNOWSKI Thiesson | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 41 | WANG William | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 43 | KETCHAM Conrad | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LIU YULIN | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 45 | THOMSON Piers | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 45 | WANG carson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 47 | QU ethan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | CHEN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 49 | CHAUDHARY Oliver | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | YANG Rony | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | SATHYAN Dhruv | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | YI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 53 | YOU Emmanuel | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | YAO Irvine | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | WANG Henry | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 56 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | TANG Jayce | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 57 | LI Kingston | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | LI Nolan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 60 | SHABBIR Mohammad Amaan | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 61 | ROULLARD Atticus | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | FERNANDEZ Chenxing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 63 | LEE Eric | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 64 | TRIVULCE Ethan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 65 | MATUSOW Brandon | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 66 | LI Jacob | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | IVANOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 68 | ZHOU Silvan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 69 | LU Jayden | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | REED Andrew | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 71 | KOKLIAGUINE Stefan | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | CHI Zachary | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 74 | DUCHNOWSKI Kempson | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | FLINT Liam | 100% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 76 | OLELE Chibuikem | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 77 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 78 | AHMAD Aydin | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 79 | WANG Franklin | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 80 | YANG Mikey | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | XIONG Alec | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 83 | LI Nathan Zeting | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 84 | WANG Alexander | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | BAIK Jinu | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 86 | FRENCH Luke | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 87 | LEE Samuel | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 88 | LAW Benjamin | 100% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | MOHANKUMAR Aaditya | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.