Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | TAFOYA Devin D. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
3 | CHOI Kaiden I. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | GADBURY Logan | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
5 | FRIEDMAN Lucas | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
6 | STEWART Tatijana I. | V V V V D D | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
7 | SYKES Elynor | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
8 | SOKOLOVAS Genadijus | V D V D V V | V V | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
9 | AGGELER Donovan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
10 | LEE Jayden J. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
11 | MUENKE Magnus | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
12 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
13 | EFE Joshua E. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
14 | DANIS Blake M. | V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
15 | MARENCIK Miles | V V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
16 | CARRIER Meredith | D V V D D D | V V D | 4.8 | 2 | -2.8 |
17 | EYMAN Hans | V V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
18 | LONG Ethan | V D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
19 | GAO Zachary | V V D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
20 | BENENSON Hayes | V V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
21 | SCHMIDT Leonard | D D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
22 | SUN Neo | D D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
23 | EMERSON Zachary | V V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
24 | ZHU Riley | D D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
25 | LEWIS Rachel | D V D D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
26 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | V D D V D D | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
27 | INGHILTERRA Luca | V D D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
28 | MUENKE Torben | D D D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
29 | SAMARRIPA Max | D V D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
30 | MU Jason | D D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
31 | HANEY Kimberly M. | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
32 | WYLIE Luke | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
33 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
34 | BEALL Milo M. | V D D V D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
35 | DAVIDSON James | D V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
36 | LEWIS-RAMIREZ Ben | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
37 | MARTEGANI Enea | V D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
38 | HOEHLE Stacy A. | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
39 | STOLLSTEIMER Jason | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
39 | SCHNEIDER Ronan | D V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
41 | KIM Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.