Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 2 | TAFOYA Devin D. | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
| 3 | CHOI Kaiden I. | - | - | - | 2% | 26% | 53% | 19% |
| 3 | GADBURY Logan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 5 | FRIEDMAN Lucas | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 6 | STEWART Tatijana I. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 7 | SYKES Elynor | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | SOKOLOVAS Genadijus | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 9 | AGGELER Donovan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 10 | LEE Jayden J. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 1% |
| 11 | MUENKE Magnus | - | 1% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 12 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 36% | 4% |
| 13 | EFE Joshua E. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | - |
| 14 | DANIS Blake M. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 33% | |
| 15 | MARENCIK Miles | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 16 | CARRIER Meredith | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 17 | EYMAN Hans | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 26% | 4% | |
| 18 | LONG Ethan | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | GAO Zachary | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% | |
| 20 | BENENSON Hayes | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 21 | SCHMIDT Leonard | - | 8% | 39% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | SUN Neo | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 23 | EMERSON Zachary | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ZHU Riley | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LEWIS Rachel | 22% | 49% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 26 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 32% | 5% |
| 27 | INGHILTERRA Luca | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | MUENKE Torben | 16% | 42% | 34% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 29 | SAMARRIPA Max | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | MU Jason | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HANEY Kimberly M. | 44% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | WYLIE Luke | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | 2% | 22% | 59% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | BEALL Milo M. | - | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 1% |
| 35 | DAVIDSON James | 6% | 33% | 44% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | LEWIS-RAMIREZ Ben | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | MARTEGANI Enea | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HOEHLE Stacy A. | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | STOLLSTEIMER Jason | 36% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | SCHNEIDER Ronan | 45% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | KIM Ethan | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.