San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 3 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 3 | HUANG Bernard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 5 | LAI Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% |
| 6 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
| 7 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% |
| 8 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 9 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 10 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 19% |
| 11 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 12 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 48% |
| 13 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 23% |
| 14 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 15 | WHITE Austin M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 16 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 17 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 17% | 1% |
| 18 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | 7% | - |
| 19 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 20 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% | 9% |
| 21 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 22 | CHEN Bryce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 23 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 24 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 26 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 29 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 31 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 32 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 37 | TAPUS Andrei | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | CRACRAFT John R. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BELANGER Jackson | 100% | 95% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | TANG Adrian | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 42 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 43 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | AMAYA Jared C. | 100% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | WONG Louis | 100% | 82% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | TAPUS Alexandru | 100% | 63% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 48 | ZUO Ethan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 3% |
| 50 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | FU Vincent | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | COTHRAN Jack | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | GERA Kaveer | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.