San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NG Eben S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 2 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | LO Conrad | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 3 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 5 | DETERING Julian | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | BAO Aaron | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 7 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | BAEK David | V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 9 | KHER Roan | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | WANG Ethan | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | SMITH Grant D. | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | ZHANG Jiening G. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | CHENG Jonathan | V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | KIM Ryan Y. | D V D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 18 | CHIN Ryan | D V V D V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 19 | TUAN Evan | V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 20 | WU Lucas | V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 21 | LO Preston | V D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | NG Micah | D V V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 23 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | D D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 24 | TEH Ryan | D D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 25 | WYMAN Julian | D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 25 | VALOUEV Aleksey | D V V D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | ZUO Ethan | D D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 28 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | D V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 29 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | V D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 30 | LI Jett | V D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 31 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | D D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | RASMUSSEN Sage | D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 33 | CHEN Justin K. | V V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 34 | LEVY Jacob | V D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 35 | FANG Jaden | D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 36 | CHEN Evan | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 37 | SUBRAMANIAM Akilesh | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 38 | AGRAWAL Niki | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 39 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 40 | CHU Colin | D D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 41 | SAH Steven | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 42 | MCCORMACK WILCOX Braeden | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 43 | ZHANG Luke | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 44 | MIN Lucas | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 45 | CARVAJAL Josmar | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.