San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NG Eben S. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
2 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
3 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
3 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
5 | DETERING Julian | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
6 | BAO Aaron | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
7 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
7 | BAEK David | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
9 | KHER Roan | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
10 | WANG Ethan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
12 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 8% | |
13 | SMITH Grant D. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
14 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
15 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
16 | CHENG Jonathan | - | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
17 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
18 | CHIN Ryan | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
19 | TUAN Evan | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
20 | WU Lucas | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
21 | LO Preston | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
22 | NG Micah | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
23 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
24 | TEH Ryan | 12% | 43% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
25 | WYMAN Julian | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
25 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 12% | 54% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
27 | ZUO Ethan | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
28 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
29 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | - |
30 | LI Jett | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
31 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | 30% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
33 | CHEN Justin K. | 1% | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
34 | LEVY Jacob | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | FANG Jaden | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
36 | CHEN Evan | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
37 | SUBRAMANIAM Akilesh | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
38 | AGRAWAL Niki | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | 2% | 20% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | CHU Colin | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
41 | SAH Steven | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
42 | MCCORMACK WILCOX Braeden | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
43 | ZHANG Luke | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | MIN Lucas | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
45 | CARVAJAL Josmar | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.