Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | - | - | 10% | 51% | 39% |
| 2 | POEI Lauren | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% |
| 3 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% | |
| 3 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | - | 5% | 39% | 56% |
| 5 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% | |
| 6 | JOO Sara | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
| 7 | CAO Kayla | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 38% | 33% | 5% |
| 8 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 3% | |
| 9 | PINEDA jade luna | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 56% | 25% |
| 10 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 35% |
| 11 | XIE Lillian | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 12 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 13 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | 1% | 7% | 39% | 53% | |
| 14 | DONG Iris | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 10% |
| 15 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 4% | 23% | 52% | 21% | |
| 16 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
| 18 | YIN Chloe | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 11% | ||
| 19 | LI savannah | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
| 20 | YANG Olivia | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 21 | FRASER Morgan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 45% | 12% |
| 22 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 23 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | - | 6% | 29% | 45% | 20% |
| 24 | LIN Yunong | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 46% | 6% |
| 24 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | HUANG Emma | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | SINGH Evangelina | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 29% | 3% | |
| 29 | LI Christina | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 30 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | ||
| 31 | SUN Erin | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | CHOI Cara | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 33 | HU Sophie | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 37% | 5% | |
| 34 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | PHAN Logan | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | KIM Sophia | 2% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 38 | CHAN Jolene | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | CHO Olivia | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | ||
| 40 | SMOLICH Emily | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 41 | FENG Claire | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | VO Evelyn | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | BAULIN Zoya | 1% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 44 | KIM Audrey | 20% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 45 | HOFF Divya | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | PARK Hannah | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | DZIWULSKI Elisabeth Claire | 10% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHENG Annalyn | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 49 | REILLY Carys | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 51 | LIU Bella | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | HAFEZ Sahar | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 52 | BALIN Julia | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | CHEN Emma | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 55 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 56 | MEITZEN Havah | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 57 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 12% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 58 | WU Charlotte | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | ||
| 59 | ZAHRAN Emily | 1% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 60 | WU Lorena | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 61 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | 9% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | PAEK Mila | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 63 | ZHU Ella | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 64 | IRIZARRY Nyla | 27% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 65 | SHARAIEVSKA Mariia | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | KHETPAL Aalia | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 67 | BLANKS Campbell | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 68 | JAIN Dia | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | HUANG Gabrielle | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | LIU Joanna | 42% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 71 | BAILEY Penelope | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | WANG Allyson | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | CAPPIELLO Francesca | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 74 | JOSEPH Hannah | 32% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 75 | ZELDIN Nina | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 76 | LI Katelyn | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | HUANG Annabelle | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 78 | LUEKEN Adelina | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.